外观
2026-08-14 全球资产日报
- 数据时间:2026-08-14 10:36:44 Asia/Shanghai
- 报告类型:全球资产日报
展开市场热力、期权压力和 Crypto 盘口
股票与 ETF 板块热力
云计算及平台
MSFT+0.64%
GOOG+0.46%
芯片设计与制造
MRVL+3.27%
GFS-0.39%
数据中心及算力基础设施
APLD-1.38%
NBIS-0.08%
光通信及互连
COHR-8.14%
关键矿物
USAR+1.47%
数字资产基础设施
CRCL+5.96%
航天与国防主题
SPCX-2.90%
半导体与存储 ETF
DRAM+4.23%
KMEM+4.22%
SOXL+1.60%
FTXL+1.07%
PSI+0.35%
其他股票
PLTR+4.04%
期权压力
QQQ0.92
SPY1.46
NVDA0.58
SPCX1.06
NBIS0.92
PLTR0.62
MSFT0.76
GOOG0.41
快照对比基准:2026-08-13。本面板只展示已落盘事实,不生成操作判断。
今日总览
核心判断
| 优先级 | 观点状态 | 市场隐含判断 | 不同判断 | 本期证据变化 | 当前动作 | 失效条件 | 下一验证 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 延续但弱化,中等信心 | 7 月 PPI 环比持平、标普与纳指上涨,市场降低了近期再加息尾部;9 月维持利率的转述概率升至 65.2%。 | 商品端通胀降温没有消除服务端与期限溢价。剔除食品、能源和贸易服务后的 PPI 环比仍涨 0.4%,30 年期拍卖得标利率升至 5.216%。 | 支持风险下降:最终需求商品 -0.7%、能源 -3.1%。保留反方:服务 +0.2%,核心替代口径同比仍为 4.7%,长债需求结构缺失。 | 保持,继续限制新增 gross:保留核心现货,不因单月 PPI 一次性放开高久期股票与 Crypto 杠杆预算。 | 后续核心 PCE、PPI 同时降温,且长端、美元、能源价格在同一窗口持续回落。 | 美国零售与通胀预期;09/10 下一次 PPI;长端、美元和成长/价值反应。 |
| 2 | 延续并增强,高信心 | COHR、NBIS 的收入和 AI 业务增长继续证明算力、光互连需求;市场仍愿意资本化远期容量。 | 需求强度已不是主要争议,现金转换、资本开支、融资条款和每股回报才决定质量。COHR 财报后下跌 7.99%,说明市场开始区分增长与资本效率。 | COHR 收入 20.5 亿美元、毛利率扩张,数据中心与通信收入同比 +59%;NBIS 收入同比 +454%、调整后 EBITDA 利润率约 41%。反方是 COHR 经营现金流大降、NBIS 全年资本开支指引 200 亿至 250 亿美元。 | 保持、不追价、冻结同因子新增:新增配额只给订单、交付、毛利率、现金转换和估值缓冲同时通过的公司。 | 云客户削减资本开支或取消订单;项目延期、融资担保、稀释或折旧假设使每股现金流持续恶化。 | COHR 正式年报现金流;NBIS 预付款、合同电力与投运容量;08/27 北京时间 NVDA 财报。 |
| 3 | 延续并增强,中等信心 | 航运受限、船只与炼厂袭击报道提高供应尾部,但 WTI、布伦特当日分别下跌 2.43%、2.15%,市场没有把每条安全事件都定价成持续断供。 | 安全风险和价格反应出现背离,能源更适合做条件式对冲研究。柴油裂解价差上升可能比原油现货更早反映炼化紧张,但设施损害尚未独立确认。 | 新增支持:ADNOC 报告两艘船遇袭、UKMTO 称交通仍受限。反方:UKMTO 同期没有确认袭击,原油回落,完整 EIA 库存数字未进入输入。 | 保持条件式对冲研究,不追油价或能源 ETF:先验证船流、保险、库存、裂解价差和期限结构,再筛公司现金流。 | 商业通航恢复,且保险、库存、运费、裂解价差、油价和能源相对强度同步正常化。 | 08/19 EIA 周报;船流与保险;WTI/Brent 期限结构;XLE/XOP 五日与二十日相对强度。 |
| 4 | 延续但弱化,中等信心 | 韩国半导体出口与代表股走强,SMH/XLK 短中期相对强度改善;市场重新给科技与芯片更高权重。 | 亚洲芯片强度修正了单向价值轮动,但软件、医疗、能源与防务仍各有中期领先区间,尚未重新收敛为单一 AI 动量。 | 韩国 7 月 ICT 出口同比 +140.6%、半导体 +178.8%;SMH 五日相对 SPY +1.87pct。反方是 SMH 二十日仍略落后,亚洲数据缺价格/数量拆分与全市场广度。 | 保持多主线研究:不做风格式清仓,也不把新增预算重新集中到半导体;保留能源、医疗、软件和防务队列。 | 科技、芯片与成长在五日、二十日、六十日全面领先,且等权、价值、医疗和能源同步转弱。 | 复核 SMH、XLK、IGV、XLV、XBI、XLE、XAR 的多周期相对收益与成交确认。 |
| 5 | 延续不变,中等信心 | 市场继续提前计入 USAR 稀土一体化与 CRCL 稳定币平台的远期价值。 | 两家公司仍处于里程碑兑现前:USAR 需要投票、交割、产能和销售,CRCL 需要 Arc 上线后的外部客户、收费和重复收入。 | USAR 明确 08/28 投票、年末 600 吨磁材年化目标;CRCL 披露 USDC 733 亿美元和 Arc 09/16 计划。两者都没有新增、可重复的外部商业收入证明。 | 保持既有小额事件风险、回避新增:不按浮亏平均成本,等待原子证据。 | Serra Verde、Stillwater 或 Round Top 明显延期;Arc/CPN 无法形成可核验商业采用或收入。 | 08/28 Serra Verde;09/16 Arc 主网;其后首批销售、外部客户和收入确认。 |
今日动作
| 标的 / 风险预算 | 当前动作 | 升级条件 | 降级 / 失效条件 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 总组合 / AI 集群 | 保持、封顶新增同因子风险。已隐藏子仓集中度高,但总组合冲击有限,不做机械式股票减仓。 | 宏观贴现率稳定,且新增公司通过订单、交付、毛利率、现金流与估值门槛。 | 云客户资本开支、项目交付或融资证伪;现有 ETF 穿透后显示同因子风险显著高于当前估计。 |
COHR / NBIS | 持有、不追价。COHR 优先补正式年报现金转换;NBIS 优先验证预付款、投运容量和融资条款。 | COHR 收复 334.18 并改善现金流;NBIS 站稳 264.90,且资本开支转为可核验收入与回款。 | COHR 失守 319.75 且现金转换恶化;NBIS 失守 254.12/234.07 且融资或交付证据转弱。 |
| 能源 / 油气 | 增加研究预算,不追价、不直接用 ETF 代替组合风险管理。当前证据仍停留在事件与行业代理层。 | 船流、保险、库存、裂解价差和期限结构共同确认收紧,并映射到生产商产量、实现油价和自由现金流。 | 通航恢复,XLE/XOP 五日与二十日相对收益转负,或库存与成品油供应恢复。 |
USAR / CRCL | 保持、停止平均成本式加仓。价格触发只用于复核,不能替代里程碑证明。 | USAR 完成投票/交割并给出可核验销售;CRCL 上线 Arc 后形成外部客户、收费与重复收入。 | USAR 跌破 17.70 附近且节点后移;CRCL 跌破 70.14 且商业化或收入确认延期。 |
跨资产主线
PPI 让“立即再通胀”的尾部下降,但没有释放全部风险预算。最终需求商品和能源价格回落,风险资产得到支持;服务、剔除食品能源及贸易服务后的价格和 30 年期拍卖又表明,长端约束仍可脱离当月 headline PPI 独立存在。今天的宏观判断从事件前防守转为持有观察,新增杠杆仍需等长端、美元和后续通胀数据共同确认。
AI 产业证据继续走强,投资命题已经推进到资本质量。COHR 与 NBIS 的收入、毛利率和 AI 业务规模证明需求;COHR 财报后下跌、NBIS 巨额资本开支和英伟达推动的新融资框架同时提醒,未来回报越来越依赖现金转换、抵押折扣、担保责任和项目利用率。现有股票风险占总组合不高,不因单名波动机械清仓;新增预算要避开同一云客户、融资和算力残值因子。
霍尔木兹安全事件增加,而原油下跌,形成今天最有价值的反向验证。若船流、保险、成品油裂解与库存后续确认实物收紧,能源可以同时改善上游现金流、抬升通胀预期并压制高久期估值;若这些数据回归正常,事件溢价会先在裂解价差和能源相对强度中回吐。研究顺序为 船流与保险 → EIA 库存 → 裂解价差和期限结构 → 公司产量、实现油价与自由现金流。
全市场快讯
| 类别 | 时间 | 事实与关键数字 | 影响资产 | 市场含义与证据边界 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 美国通胀 | 08/13 20:30 北京时间 | 7 月最终需求 PPI 环比 0、低于预期 +0.2%,同比 +4.7%;商品 -0.7%、服务 +0.2%、能源 -3.1%,剔除食品能源和贸易服务后环比 +0.4%。 | 美债、美元、美股、Crypto | 立即通胀尾部下降,服务与核心替代口径仍偏粘;PPI 不单独决定利率路径。 | BLS PPI,金十快讯 |
| 长债拍卖 | 08/14 01:04 | 30 年期国债拍卖得标利率 5.216%,前值 5.058%;输入没有投标倍数和间接投标比例。 | 长债、高久期股票、美元 | 得标利率抬升保留期限溢价警告;单次拍卖且结构数据缺失,不外推为持续需求崩塌。 | 金十拍卖结果 |
| 美股收盘 | 08/13 美东 | 道指 +0.13%、标普 +0.65%、纳指 +0.81%;COHR -7.99%、NBIS -1.60%,CRCL +5.75%。 | 美股、AI 基建、稳定币 | 指数受通胀缓和支持,个股继续按现金转换与执行质量分化。 | Reuters 市场综述 |
| 霍尔木兹 | 08/13–08/14 | ADNOC 称两艘船通过海峡时遭袭且无人受伤;UKMTO 称交通受限并有骚扰监视,同时该报告期没有确认袭击。 | 原油、航运、保险、通胀 | 单方报告互有冲突,安全事件尚未等同于可量化断供。 | 船只事件,UKMTO 口径 |
| 原油与炼化 | 08/14 03:31 前后 | WTI 9 月 81.25 美元、-2.43%;Brent 10 月 87.07 美元、-2.15%。胡塞控制媒体称沙特阿美 Jizan 炼厂遭无人机袭击,柴油裂解价差升破 98 美元。 | 原油、成品油、炼化、航空 | 原油回落与裂解价差上升提示风险可能集中在炼化/成品油;设施损害和因果关系未独立确认。 | 原油收盘,炼厂报道 |
| AI 光互连 | 08/12–08/14 | COHR Q4 收入 20.5 亿美元、同比 +34%,非 GAAP 毛利率 40.2%;数据中心与通信收入约 16.15 亿美元、同比 +59%。 | COHR、光通信、AI 供应链 | 需求和利润率确认;第三方整理显示全年现金流与资本开支承压,需用正式年报复核。 | COHR 官方业绩,产业链整理 |
| AI 云 | 08/13 | NBIS Q2 收入约 5.82 亿美元、同比 +454%,调整后 EBITDA 约 2.36 亿美元;资本开支约 57 亿美元,全年指引 200 亿至 250 亿美元。 | NBIS、AI 云、数据中心融资 | 需求与预付款增强可见度,资本开支和融资仍决定每股回报。 | NBIS 业绩整理 |
| AI 融资 | 08/14 | 报道称英伟达与多家金融机构讨论约 5000 亿美元 AI 融资,可能以 GPU/收入流为抵押,并在个案中担保约四分之一贷款。 | NVDA、AI 云、私人信贷 | 可能延长建设周期,也把 GPU 残值、客户信用和担保风险引入供应链;尚无正式协议。 | 融资方案报道 |
| 亚洲半导体 | 08/14 08:00–10:26 | 韩国 7 月 ICT 出口同比 +140.6% 至 534 亿美元,半导体 +178.8% 至 410 亿美元;中芯国际指引 Q3 收入环比 +2% 至 +4%、毛利率 26% 至 28%。 | 韩国芯片、A/H 半导体、全球供应链 | 支持亚洲芯片需求与产能利用率;缺价格/数量拆分和公司级盈利映射。 | 韩国 ICT 出口,中芯国际指引 |
宏观
| 主题 | 最新事实 | 市场影响 | 后续验证 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 美国生产者价格 | 7 月 PPI 环比持平、同比 +4.7%;能源和商品回落,服务及剔除食品能源和贸易服务后的口径仍上涨。 | 降低近期再加息尾部,尚不足以确认服务通胀和企业成本全面回落。 | 核心 PCE、零售销售、密歇根通胀预期;09/10 下一次 PPI。 | BLS 官方发布 |
| 就业边际 | 初请失业金 20.9 万,高于预期 20.2 万;四周均值 19.9 万。 | 单周数据略弱但绝对水平仍低,支持“就业降温但未失速”的条件路径。 | 连续申请、非农、工资与后续四周均值。 | 金十财经日历,本次输入无详情 URL |
| 利率定价与联储 | 金十转述 CME:9 月维持 3.50%–3.75% 概率 65.2%、加息 25bp 概率 34.8%;7 月 FOMC 以 9:3 维持利率。 | 加息尾部下降,但官员分歧和长端供给使高久期资产仍受约束。 | 后续官员表态、长端与美元反应;概率变化只作市场定价,不作政策承诺。 | 金十 CME 观察,Federal Reserve |
| 储备管理 | 美联储暂停一个月储备管理国债购买,仍计划通过 09/14 再投资约 170 亿美元,并称该操作不代表政策立场。 | 技术性操作可能影响短端流动性,但不能直接写成货币政策转向。 | 准备金、回购利率、购买重启安排。 | 输入中的美联储公开说明 |
| 中国流动性 | 央行当日净投放 3480 亿元,本周净投放 2505 亿元。 | 有利于短端资金面稳定,不能替代信用需求、盈利和地产验证。 | DR007、人民币、信贷与 A 股成交扩散。 | 金十公开快讯汇总 |
地缘与政策
| 主题 | 最新事实 | 影响链条 | 后续验证 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 霍尔木兹通航 | ADNOC 报告两艘船遇袭;UKMTO 称商业交通受限、商船受骚扰监视,但同期没有确认袭击。 | 安全风险先进入船流、保险和运费,再影响近月油价、裂解价差、能源现金流与通胀预期。 | 船舶 AIS、港口装运、保险报价、官方共同文本。 | ADNOC 口径,UKMTO 口径 |
| 美国对伊政策 | 美国财长称将继续制裁伊朗并在霍尔木兹维持封锁。 | 表态提高政策风险溢价;尚未落地的新法律措施、执行对象和时间表缺失。 | 财政部 OFAC 文件、白宫/国会正式文本、执行范围。 | 金十转述 |
| 沙特炼化设施 | 胡塞控制媒体称 Jizan 炼厂遭无人机袭击,柴油裂解价差升破 98 美元。 | 若设施损害成立,成品油短缺可能先于原油供应反映;当前无法量化停产和修复时间。 | Saudi Aramco/沙特官方、装置运行、出口与裂解价差。 | 金十报道 |
| 日本汇率 | 美元兑日元约 159.51;一名前日本外汇官员称协调干预可能发生,并预计日本央行加息。 | 接近 160 提高干预风险,官员个人评论不代表已决定的联合行动。 | 日本财务省、BOJ 和合作央行正式声明;实际干预流量。 | Reuters 市场综述与公开评论汇总 |
当日已开盘市场盘面
| 市场 | 观察时间 | 指数表现 | 广度 / 代表线索 | 判断 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 韩国 | 08/14 11:29 KST 附近 | KOSPI 6915.61,+1.50%;成交额约 14.09 万亿韩元。 | 三星电子 +0.65%、SK 海力士 +3.39%、现代汽车 +6.09%;没有同一时点完整广度,三星报价较指数滞后约 18 分钟。 | 芯片与汽车代表股支持风险偏好,但开盘快讯的 +2.68% 已被后续快照取代;不外推为全市场扩散。 | KOSPI 快照,三星电子 |
| A 股 | 08/14 10:02 北京时间附近 | 上证综指 3924.99,-0.05%;深证成指 14363.24,+0.52%。 | 两个指数时间相差约 24 分钟;成交额与完整广度缺失。 | 深市相对强于沪市,证据不足以写全面风险偏好或行业扩散。 | 上证综指,深证成指 |
持仓观察
| 分类 | 标的 | 当前 / 盘外 / 常规涨幅 | 结构 / 强弱 | 最近均线压力 / 支撑 | 支撑 | 压力 / 确认 | 日线九转 | 新闻 / 日历 / 期权 | 判断 / 动作 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 芯片设计 | MRVL | 224.17 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 222.18、+2.35%,盘外 +0.90%;已隐藏 | 压力测试,上强下修;日线高于 MA5/10/20/30/120、低于 MA60。 | MA60 234.36 / MA5 215.77 | 222.02、221.52,其后 218.26 | 225.58/226.54,且日线站稳 222.81。 | 结构化值缺失,不作触发。 | 08/28 04:45 北京时间业绩会;ATM IV 73.8%,PCR 成交/OI 0.60/0.90,Max Pain 200。 | 保持、不追价。站稳 226.54 后仍需订单、毛利和资本回报;失守 218.26/215.35 时降级。 |
| 晶圆制造 | GFS | 52.97 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 52.69、-0.92%,盘外 +0.53%;已隐藏 | 失效观察;接近 MA20,低周期反弹尚未确认。 | MA20 52.71 / MA5 52.13 | 52.13,其后 51.61/51.25 | 52.95/53.24,并站稳 MA20。 | 结构化值缺失,不作触发。 | Q2 收入 17.86 亿美元;硅光子 3 亿美元 LOI 尚未等同到账。IV 55.47%,Max Pain 55。 | 保持、不摊薄。收复 53.24 且拨款/客户收入落地才升级;失守 51.25 时复核。 |
| 数据中心 | APLD | 30.72 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 30.62、-1.70%,盘外 +0.33%;已隐藏 | 回踩;日线高于 MA5/10/20/30、低于 MA60/120。 | MA120 33.62 / MA5 29.95 | 30.28、30.13,其后 29.94 | 30.83/30.99,并保持 MA5。 | 结构化值缺失,不作触发。 | 已发行 15.9 亿美元 7% 2031 年担保票据;融资不证明项目现金流。IV 86.18%,Max Pain 30。 | 保持、不摊薄。突破 30.99 后仍需交付、供电、客户回款;失守 MA5 时降级。 |
| 战略资源 | USAR | 18.68 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 18.61、+1.09%,盘外 +0.38%;已隐藏 | 回踩、分歧;低于 MA5/60/120,高于 MA10。 | MA5 18.86 / MA10 17.70 | 18.58/18.47,其后 17.70 | 18.72/18.85 并站稳 MA5。 | D1 仅有历史高 9 描述,结构化值缺失,不作触发。 | 08/28 Serra Verde 投票;Q2 收入约 580 万美元、调整后每股亏损 0.15 美元。IV 79.3%,Max Pain 17.5。 | 保持里程碑小风险、回避新增。投票、交割、销售与产能证据落地后再升级;跌破 MA10 且节点延后时降级。 |
| 光通信 | COHR | 326.70 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 327.23、-7.99%,盘外 -0.16%;已隐藏 | 失效观察;高于 MA10/20/30/120,低于 MA5/60。 | MA5 343.14 / MA10 325.29 | 325.47/325.29,其后 319.75 | 330.08/334.18。 | 结构化值缺失,不作触发。 | Q4 收入与毛利率确认需求;现金流/资本开支需正式年报复核。IV 81.9%,PCR 1.13/1.23,Max Pain 340。 | 持有、不追价。先守 325.29/319.75;现金转换与扩产回报改善后才增加。 |
| 稳定币基础设施 | CRCL | 75.53 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 75.38、+5.75%,盘外 +0.20%;已隐藏 | 压力测试;高于 MA5/10/20/30,低于 MA60/120。 | MA60 76.56 / MA5 70.31 | 73.40/73.35,其后 72.95/70.14 | 76.10/76.36。 | 结构化值缺失,不作触发。 | Arc 计划 09/16 上线;10/16 120C、80P 的 Volume/OI 较高但方向未知。IV 80.76%,Max Pain 71。 | 保持、不摊薄。收复 MA60 只确认价格,仍需外部客户和重复收入;失守 70.14 且节点延后时降级。 |
| 云平台 | GOOG | 343.95 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 343.94、+0.46%,盘外近 0;已隐藏 | 失效观察、分歧;仅高于 MA120,低于 MA5/10/20/30/60。 | MA20 345.57 / MA120 342.70 | 342.20/342.48,其后 337.12/333.69 | 345.57,随后 4H 347.03。 | 结构化值缺失,不作触发。 | 本窗口没有足以改变 thesis 的新增经营事实;IV 28.43%,PCR 0.42/0.84,Max Pain 350。 | 保持观察,不按超跌摊薄。收复 347.03 且公司事实补齐再评估;失守 333.69 时降级。 |
| AI 云 | NBIS | 258.98 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 255.04、-1.60%,盘外 +1.54%;已隐藏 | 压力测试、同向;日线高于全部均线。 | 无上方均线 / MA60 221.82 | 255.76/255.32,其后 254.12/234.07 | 264.90,随后 4H 275.74。 | 结构化值缺失,不作触发。 | Q2 收入、EBITDA 与预付款支持需求;资本开支和融资仍是核心风险。IV 104.76%,PCR 0.93/1.03,Max Pain 200。 | 持有、不追价。264.90 只确认价格;失守 254.12 且项目/融资证据转弱时降低风险。 |
| 软件 / AI 平台 | PLTR | 177.95 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 179.01、+4.66%,盘外 -0.59%;已隐藏 | 压力测试、同向;日线高于全部均线。 | 无上方均线 / MA5 174.45 | 177.43/177.94,其后 174.45 | 179.76/180.01。 | D1 仅有高 9 历史描述,结构化值缺失,不作触发。 | 官方标题显示 Q2 美国商业收入 +149%、总收入 +93%并上调指引;正文证据未完全展开。IV 47.73%,Max Pain 140。 | 保持极小仓位,不建复杂对冲。扩大前先补完整公司底表;失守 MA5 时复核。 |
ETF 持仓与观察
| ETF | 当前 / 盘外 / 常规涨幅 | NAV / 溢折价 | 前十大内部强弱 | 技术结构 / 日线九转 | 集中判断 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI | 151.50 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 151.61、+0.42%,盘外 -0.07%;已隐藏 | NAV、溢折价、AUM 与成交量未取得;费率 0.56%。 | 前十大权重 49.89%,8 涨 2 跌,加权涨幅约 +0.98%;AMAT 6.47%、NVDA 5.60%、KLAC 5.56%。 | 回踩;高于 MA5/10/20/30/120、低于 MA60 155.16;确认 151.87/152.32,支撑 150.35/150.14;九转结构化值缺失。 | 保持、封顶新增。底层与单名半导体存在同因子重叠,股票风险占总组合不高,不机械减仓。 |
SOXX | 549.90 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 550.74、+0.76%。 | 08/12 NAV 547.01、市场价 546.61、折价 0.07%;AUM 429.95 亿美元、费率 0.33%。 | 前十大权重 60.86%,9 涨 1 跌,加权 +1.26%;NVDA 8.93%、MU 7.90%、AMD 7.88%。 | 5/20/60 日相对 SPY +2.21/+0.20/+5.75pct,量比 0.55;九转结构化值缺失。 | 观察。多周期相对强度较 PSI 更完整,低量使新增确认不足。 |
SOXL | 144.43 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 145.36、+2.25%。 | 08/12 NAV 142.40、市场价 142.16,派生折价约 0.17%;费率 0.75%,每日 3 倍。 | 可报价股票前十大权重 41.31%,9 涨 1 跌,加权 +1.26%;未计 swap 与现金。 | 5/20/60 日相对 SPY +8.63/-1.60/-9.52pct,量比 0.70;九转结构化值缺失。 | 回避长期表达。只适合有明确 1H/4H 退出条件的战术风险,不承载中长期 AI thesis。 |
FTXL | 常规收 239.79、+1.07%。 | 08/11 NAV 231.30、市场价 231.26,派生折价约 0.02%;AUM 13.3 亿美元、费率 0.60%,数据较旧。 | 前十大权重 66.66%,9 涨 1 跌,加权 +1.85%;INTC 11.54%、MU 11.52%、MRVL 6.93%。 | 5/20/60 日相对 SPY +2.80/+0.90/-0.92pct,量比 0.21;九转结构化值缺失。 | 观察。单名集中和低成交确认没有提供优于现有 PSI 的替换依据。 |
DRAM | 57.12 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 56.93、+3.89%。 | NAV 与溢折价未取得;费率 0.65%。 | 股票与 TRS 合并前十大权重 94.26%,10 只全涨,加权 +3.67%;MU 25.63%、三星 25.53%、SK 海力士 20.91%。 | 5/20/60 日相对 SPY +9.46/+5.15/+10.12pct,量比 1.05;九转结构化值缺失。 | 观察、不追涨。强度和成交确认最佳,底层三只已占约 72%,集中和衍生品路径都很高。 |
KMEM | 18.52 美元(IBKR 延迟);常规收 18.59、+4.61%。 | 08/12 NAV 17.55、市场价 17.77、溢价 1.23%;AUM 2756 万美元、费率 0.65%。 | 可报价股票仅占 26.95%,SK 海力士 19.96%、三星 6.99%,加权 +2.94%;期权、国债和现金未计。 | 5/20 日相对 SPY +9.84/+3.16pct,无 60 日样本;期权没有可用到期日,九转结构化值缺失。 | 观察。溢价、小规模、短样本与底层不完整使其不适合作为当前首选工具。 |
Crypto 与组合风险
| 资产 | Binance USDS-M 盘面 | 08/13 ETF/ETP 流量 | 判断 / 动作 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTC | 63,519.9 美元,24h +0.16%;Funding +0.009304%,OI 约 109,851 BTC。 | 已汇总产品净流出 1.254 亿美元;IBIT 缺失,FBTC -5510 万、ARKB -5880 万美元。 | 保持、不增加合约名义。价格横盘与正 Funding 没有改善盈亏不对称;流量总额仍受 IBIT 缺失限制。 | Binance USDS-M,Farside BTC |
ETH | 1,887.66 美元,24h +0.66%;Funding +0.004669%,OI 约 235.28 万 ETH。 | 已汇总产品净流入 650 万美元;ETHA、ETHB 缺失。 | 保持、不增加合约名义。若组合主动降风险,优先处理与 WETH 现货方向重叠的 ETH 永续。 | Binance USDS-M,Farside ETH |
SOL | 76.07 美元,24h +0.64%;Funding +0.0100%,OI 约 854 万 SOL。 | 已覆盖产品合计 0。 | 保持无杠杆 Earn,不因当日上涨或 APY 加仓。2.57% APY 无法覆盖价格尾部。 | Binance USDS-M,Farside SOL |
- 已隐藏该估算未计滑点、Funding、相关性跃升与场所风险。
- 已隐藏已实现增量与 APY 估算分开,后者不能抵消
ETH价格、智能合约与链上流动性风险。 - 已隐藏稳定币分区具备高流动性表象,但集中在单一链与协议路径,风险预算不能把它与无风险银行现金等同。
美股机会雷达
板块机会地图
| 分级 | 板块 / 行业 / 主题 | 强度与 Why now | 第一反对理由 | 升级 / 失效条件 | 下一步 workflow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 能源 / 油气(XLE、XOP) | XLE 五日/二十日相对 SPY +3.77/+3.47pct,XOP +6.04/+4.03pct;霍尔木兹提供实物验证窗口。 | 两者 60 日相对收益仍为 -4.52/-3.63pct,量比低于 1,且没有公司级产量、实现油价与现金流事实。 | 船流、保险、库存、期限结构和公司现金流共同确认则升级;通航恢复或五日/二十日领先消失则失效。 | 继续经济影响分析,再筛上游产量、资产负债表与自由现金流。 |
| B | 半导体(SMH、XLK) | 韩国半导体出口强,SMH 五日/六十日相对 SPY +1.87/+2.55pct,XLK 二十日/六十日 +3.85/+4.10pct。 | SMH 二十日 -0.07pct,量比仅 0.56;已有组合同因子暴露,没有未持仓公司级证明。 | 公司订单、毛利率、现金流与成交扩散同时确认则升级;多周期强度转负则降级。 | 先做现有暴露穿透,避免用另一只芯片 ETF 叠加同因子。 |
| C | 软件(IGV) | 1/5/20/60 日相对 SPY 均领先,20 日 +9.81pct,量比 1.86,接近窗口高点。 | 输入没有 ARR、续费、利润率和估值事实,行业价格强度不能生成公司候选。 | 公司级经营与估值证据补齐后升级;二十日领先消失则失效。 | 建公司底表后重新运行机会发现。 |
| C | 医疗 / 生物科技(XLV、XBI) | XLV 五日/二十日/六十日相对 SPY +1.18/+0.45/+10.24pct;XBI 六十日 +17.55pct。 | XBI 二十日 -0.42pct,缺临床、审批、收入与盈利修正。 | 基本面催化与二十日强度同向后升级;中期领先消失则失效。 | 补公司级管线、收入与政策事实。 |
| C | 航空航天与国防(XAR) | 五日/二十日/六十日相对 SPY +2.04/+9.14/+5.67pct,量比 0.89。 | 没有预算、合同、积压、交付和公司收入映射。 | 政府合同与公司积压确认才升级;相对领先转负则失效。 | 补合同授予与公司 IR。 |
| Reject | NVDA 融资扩张 | 5000 亿美元潜在融资框架可能延长 AI 建设周期。 | 方案处于早期,没有正式协议、担保上限、抵押折扣或对 NVDA 收入/现金流的可核验影响。 | 正式条款与财务影响披露后才重开。 | 留在经济影响跟踪,不进入公司级买入候选。 |
未持仓标的下钻
本期没有公司级未持仓候选。能源、软件、医疗、防务和半导体各自提供了研究方向,但没有一只未持仓证券同时具备订单、积压、收入、利润率、资本开支或明确监管节点级证明。NVDA 融资报道也没有跨过正式协议与财务影响门槛。
组合暴露叠加
| radarId | 研究方向 | 组合暴露 | 含义 |
|---|---|---|---|
| energy-oil-gas | 能源 / 油气 | 已隐藏 | 有事件和相对强度、缺公司证明;优先补研究,不代表立即买入。 |
| semiconductor-breadth | 半导体 | 已隐藏 | 新证据优先用于验证持仓,不自动增加主题配额。 |
| software-relative-strength | 软件 | 已隐藏 | 不用常识把持仓自动计入分散度。 |
| healthcare-biotech | 医疗 / 生物科技 | 已隐藏 | 可作为不同经营驱动的研究方向,仍需公司基本面。 |
| aerospace-defense | 航空航天与国防 | 已隐藏 | 缺公司到主题的量化映射。 |
重要日历
| 日期 / 时间(北京时间) | 确认状态 | 标的 / 类别 | 事件 | 需要验证 | 预先动作 / 失效条件 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19 | confirmed schedule | 原油 | EIA 周度石油状况报告 | 库存、成品油供应、炼厂开工和进口是否确认霍尔木兹/炼厂冲击。 | 能源只增研究预算;库存与通航恢复时降级。 | EIA WPSR |
| 08/27 05:00 | confirmed | NVDA / AI 供应链 | FY2027 Q2 业绩会 | 数据中心收入、毛利率、客户资本开支、融资框架与担保责任。 | 作为 AI 需求转化为现金回报的验证,不提前追价。 | NVIDIA IR |
| 08/28 04:45 | confirmed | MRVL | FY2027 Q2 业绩会 | 数据中心订单、收入、毛利率、客户集中和资本回报。 | 财报前不扩大同因子风险;价格突破不能替代订单。 | Marvell IR 公司日历输入(已落盘) |
| 08/28 | management stated | USAR | Serra Verde 股东投票 | 投票、交割条件、融资后股数、现金流与 6400 吨产能路径。 | 节点落地并给出销售/产能证明后才考虑新增;延期则降级。 | USAR 电话会整理 |
| 09/10 | confirmed schedule | 美国宏观 | 8 月 PPI | 服务、能源、核心替代口径与历史修订。 | 与核心 PCE、长端和美元共同决定是否释放更多 gross。 | BLS PPI |
| 09/16 | management plan | CRCL / Arc | Arc 主网计划上线 | 外部客户、真实交易、收费、验证者参与与重复收入。 | 上线只完成技术节点;商业收入可核验后才升级。 | Circle Q2 电话会整理 |
| 09/23 / 10/09 | company schedule | GFS | 股息登记 / 支付 | 0.12 美元股息及公司资本回报延续性。 | 股息不改变晶圆需求、拨款与估值 thesis。 | GlobalFoundries 公司日历输入 |
| 10/01 | management plan | USAR | CEO 交接 | Serra Verde 管理整合、项目责任和更新后的产能计划。 | 交接不替代交易完成和产销兑现。 | USAR 电话会整理 |
| 10/06 | confirmed | MRVL | Investor Day | 产品路线、长期财务模型和资本回报。 | 只把量化目标和后续实际兑现纳入 thesis。 | Marvell IR 公司日历输入(已落盘) |
ETF 前十大持仓单日涨跌
权重来自发行商持仓文件;涨跌为报告日及以前最近两个完整交易日收盘对比。成分只用于 ETF 结构观察,不计作直接持仓。
PSI · 2026-08-12 · 涨跌覆盖 10/10
- 发行商:Invesco
- 持仓口径:发行商官方股票持仓
- 来源:发行商持仓文件
| 排名 | 成分 | 权重 | 持仓日期 | 价格日期 | 收盘 | 单日涨跌 | 价格来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMAT Applied Materials Inc | 6.47% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 534.54 | -2.48% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 2 | NVDA NVIDIA Corp | 5.60% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 225.30 | +0.54% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 3 | KLAC KLA Corp | 5.56% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 209.37 | +0.54% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 4 | MU Micron Technology Inc | 5.46% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 949.83 | +4.23% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 5 | LRCX Lam Research Corp | 5.43% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 337.01 | +3.34% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 6 | AMD Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.15% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 483.01 | +0.02% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 7 | ADI Analog Devices Inc | 4.92% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 381.17 | -0.85% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 8 | INTC Intel Corp | 4.39% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 104.56 | +3.58% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 9 | ONTO Onto Innovation Inc | 3.60% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 337.82 | +0.14% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 10 | ENTG Entegris Inc | 3.32% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 163.81 | +1.69% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
- 无额外口径限制。
SOXX · 2026-08-12 · 涨跌覆盖 10/10
- 发行商:iShares / BlackRock
- 持仓口径:发行商官方股票持仓
- 来源:发行商持仓文件
| 排名 | 成分 | 权重 | 持仓日期 | 价格日期 | 收盘 | 单日涨跌 | 价格来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA NVIDIA CORP | 8.93% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 225.30 | +0.54% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 2 | MU MICRON TECHNOLOGY | 7.90% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 949.83 | +4.23% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 3 | AMD ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 7.88% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 483.01 | +0.02% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 4 | AVGO BROADCOM INC | 7.84% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 417.82 | +0.43% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 5 | INTC INTEL CORPORATION | 5.36% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 104.56 | +3.58% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 6 | AMAT APPLIED MATERIAL INC | 5.13% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 534.54 | -2.48% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 7 | KLAC KLA | 4.56% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 209.37 | +0.54% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 8 | TSM TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING | 4.49% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 430.49 | +0.31% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 9 | MRVL MARVELL TECHNOLOGY | 4.46% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 222.18 | +2.35% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 10 | LRCX LAM RESEARCH | 4.31% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 337.01 | +3.34% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
- 无额外口径限制。
SOXL · 2026-08-13 · 涨跌覆盖 10/10
- 发行商:Direxion
- 持仓口径:发行商官方可报价股票主线位
- 来源:发行商持仓文件
| 排名 | 成分 | 权重 | 持仓日期 | 价格日期 | 收盘 | 单日涨跌 | 价格来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA NVIDIA CORP | 6.06% | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-13 | 225.30 | +0.54% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 2 | MU MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 5.36% | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-13 | 949.83 | +4.23% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 3 | AMD ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 5.35% | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-13 | 483.01 | +0.02% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 4 | AVGO BROADCOM INC | 5.32% | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-13 | 417.82 | +0.43% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 5 | INTC INTEL CORP | 3.64% | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-13 | 104.56 | +3.58% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 6 | AMAT APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 3.48% | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-13 | 534.54 | -2.48% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 7 | KLAC KLA CORP | 3.10% | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-13 | 209.37 | +0.54% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 8 | TSM TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR-SP ADR | 3.05% | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-13 | 430.49 | +0.31% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 9 | MRVL MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC | 3.03% | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-13 | 222.18 | +2.35% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 10 | LRCX LAM RESEARCH CORP | 2.93% | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-13 | 337.01 | +3.34% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
- SOXL 的现金、货币市场工具和指数 swap 未纳入可报价成分表;表内权重不是基金完整经济敞口。
FTXL · 2026-08-12 · 涨跌覆盖 10/10
- 发行商:First Trust
- 持仓口径:发行商官方股票持仓
- 来源:发行商持仓文件
| 排名 | 成分 | 权重 | 持仓日期 | 价格日期 | 收盘 | 单日涨跌 | 价格来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INTC Intel Corporation | 11.54% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 104.56 | +3.58% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 2 | MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 11.52% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 949.83 | +4.23% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 3 | MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 6.93% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 222.18 | +2.35% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 4 | AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 6.79% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 417.82 | +0.43% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 5 | NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 6.59% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 225.30 | +0.54% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 6 | AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 6.29% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 483.01 | +0.02% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 7 | QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 5.97% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 164.79 | +1.05% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 8 | AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 3.84% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 534.54 | -2.48% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 9 | LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 3.63% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 337.01 | +3.34% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 10 | KLAC KLA Corporation | 3.56% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-13 | 209.37 | +0.54% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
- First Trust 说明该持仓页反映前一营业日申赎交易,可能与托管/会计代理当前持仓不同。
DRAM · 2026-08-14 · 涨跌覆盖 10/10
- 发行商:Roundhill Investments / Roundhill Financial Inc.
- 持仓口径:发行商合并股票与 swap 的证券敞口
- 来源:发行商持仓文件
| 排名 | 成分 | 权重 | 持仓日期 | 价格日期 | 收盘 | 单日涨跌 | 价格来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MU MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 25.63% | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-13 | 949.83 | +4.23% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 2 | 005930.KS Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | 25.53% | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-14 | 270,000.00 | +0.75% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 3 | 000660.KS SK hynix Inc | 20.91% | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-14 | 1,652,000.00 | +3.70% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 4 | STX Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | 5.15% | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-13 | 921.37 | +4.91% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 5 | SNDK Sandisk Corp | 4.49% | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-13 | 1,528.11 | +13.67% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 6 | WDC Western Digital Corp | 4.22% | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-13 | 487.29 | +7.31% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 7 | 285A.T Kioxia Holdings Corp | 3.32% | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-14 | 53,890.00 | +4.03% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 8 | 2408.TW Nanya Technology Corp | 2.64% | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-14 | 517.00 | +0.58% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 9 | 2344.TW Winbond Electronics Corp | 1.21% | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-14 | 185.00 | +4.52% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 10 | 603986.SS GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc | 1.16% | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-14 | 415.34 | +2.68% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
- Roundhill 按官网口径合并同一证券的股票与 total return swap 权重;现金、国债和货币市场工具未纳入可报价成分表。
KMEM · 2026-08-12 · 涨跌覆盖 2/2
- 发行商:Kurv Investment Management LLC
- 持仓口径:发行商官方可报价股票主线位
- 来源:发行商持仓文件
| 排名 | 成分 | 权重 | 持仓日期 | 价格日期 | 收盘 | 单日涨跌 | 价格来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 000660.KS SK hynix Inc | 19.96% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-14 | 1,652,000.00 | +3.70% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
| 2 | 005930.KS Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | 6.99% | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-14 | 270,000.00 | +0.75% | Yahoo Finance chart API |
- KMEM 当前官方文件中的期权、国债和现金无法用普通股票收盘价表达单日涨跌,未纳入可报价成分表。
重要文章与快讯
重要文章
| 重要性 | 中文标题 | 发布日期 | 来源 | 相关标的 | 评级理由 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5/5 高 | 英伟达探索芯片资产融资 | 2026-08-14 | Motley Fool | NVDA | 内容直接关联NVDA及AI资本开支融资,涉及潜在需求扩张和信用风险两条重要路径;证据仍停留在早期讨论。 |
| 5/5 高 | AI云营收暴增扩产承压 | 2026-08-14 | GuruFocus.com | NBIS | 文章提供NBIS最新季度增长、资本开支、融资和产能目标,直接影响对AI云扩张质量及执行风险的阅读优先级。 |
| 5/5 高 | 温和通胀缓解加息压力 | 2026-08-13 | Reuters | MSFT, ^GSPC | 发布时间接近报告日,覆盖通胀、联储政策、长端利率和股市,且与MSFT及跨资产市场直接相关。 |
| 5/5 高 | 美国7月生产者价格趋稳 | 2026-08-13 | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | - | BLS官方数据发布时间新、事实密度高,涵盖服务、能源、原材料和核心价格分项,对利率与估值讨论具有广泛关联。 |
| 5/5 高 | 数字美元平台扩张提速 | 2026-08-12 | Motley Fool | CRCL | 这是CRCL最新季度经营与平台战略材料,包含业绩、USDC网络、Arc主网和CPN变现等直接影响公司估值的事实。 |
| 4/5 中高 | 光通信业绩分化映射需求 | 2026-08-13 | 24/7 Wall St. | CIEN, COHR, CSCO, NOK, NVDA | 直接覆盖COHR财报及光通信产业链,提供现金流、毛利率和订单等高密度事实;盘面数据存在口径差异。 |
| 4/5 中高 | Coherent业绩与光连接需求 | 2026-08-12 | Coherent Corp. | COHR | 公司正式业绩披露提供高密度财务事实,并直接关联COHR及AI数据中心光互联需求;未来增长判断仍依赖管理层表述。 |
| 4/5 中高 | 美国稀土链加速脱离中国 | 2026-08-11 | Zacks | USAR | USAR直接关联稀土供应链和扩产节点,事实密度较高;文章距报告日已有数天,关键事项仍处于计划或审批阶段。 |
金十快讯
韩国7月ICT出口增长140.6%
ICT出口同比增长140.6%至534亿美元,半导体出口增长178.8%至410亿美元,ICT贸易顺差351亿美元。
境内科技ETF出现高溢价并临时停牌
金十汇总称中韩半导体ETF、纳指ETF、全球芯片LOF和标普500ETF出现较高溢价;中韩半导体ETF于8月14日开市至10:30临时停牌。
中芯国际Q3指引及利用率
预计Q3收入环比增长2%—4%、毛利率26%—28%,计入新增产能后利用率约95%;Q2收入30亿美元、毛利率25.3%。
亚太市场分化
KOSPI开盘+2.68%,三星电子+2%,SK海力士+6%;日经225+0.64%;港股恒指开盘-0.70%、恒科-0.60%;A股开盘上证+0.08%、创业板+0.67%。
美国称继续制裁并封锁霍尔木兹
美国财长贝森特称将继续制裁伊朗并在霍尔木兹保持封锁,禁止任何物品进出伊朗港口。
ADNOC称两艘船只通过霍尔木兹时遭袭
ADNOC称两艘船只周四通过霍尔木兹海峡时遭袭,无人员受伤报告。
国际油价13日下跌
WTI 9月合约81.25美元/桶,跌2.43%;布伦特10月合约87.07美元/桶,跌2.15%。
美国30年期国债竞拍得标利率5.216%
8月13日30年期国债竞拍得标利率5.216%,前值5.058%。
柴油裂解价差升破98美元
在有报道称胡塞袭击沙特阿美炼油厂后,柴油裂解价差升破98美元,创历史新高。
霍尔木兹商业交通受限
英国海事贸易组织称商业交通仍处受限水平;同期称伊朗革命卫队继续骚扰和监视商船,但报告期内无已确认攻击。
美国7月PPI低于预期
PPI月率0%,预期0.2%;年率4.7%,预期4.9%。
韩国7月ICT出口增长140.6%
快讯正文
ICT出口同比增长140.6%至534亿美元,半导体出口增长178.8%至410亿美元,ICT贸易顺差351亿美元。
巴西启动经济对等法案程序
快讯正文
巴西政府拟反制美国对巴西产品的新关税措施,并请求外交磋商。
中国央行净投放3480亿元
快讯正文
今日开展3490亿元隔夜逆回购和10000亿元买断式逆回购,因到期因素当日净投放3480亿元;本周净投放2505亿元。
境内科技ETF出现高溢价并临时停牌
快讯正文
金十汇总称中韩半导体ETF、纳指ETF、全球芯片LOF和标普500ETF出现较高溢价;中韩半导体ETF于8月14日开市至10:30临时停牌。
中芯国际Q3指引及利用率
快讯正文
预计Q3收入环比增长2%—4%、毛利率26%—28%,计入新增产能后利用率约95%;Q2收入30亿美元、毛利率25.3%。
日元干预可能再次发生
快讯正文
日本前高级外汇外交官称日元过弱,日美协调干预可能再次发生;预计日本央行9月加息、12月或明年1月再加息。
亚太市场分化
快讯正文
KOSPI开盘+2.68%,三星电子+2%,SK海力士+6%;日经225+0.64%;港股恒指开盘-0.70%、恒科-0.60%;A股开盘上证+0.08%、创业板+0.67%。
DeepSeek产品与定价信息
快讯正文
金十科技汇总称DeepSeek将于8月17日涨价,最高涨幅500%,并开放Harness公测;同一汇总列出Gemini 3.7 Flash。
美国称继续制裁并封锁霍尔木兹
快讯正文
美国财长贝森特称将继续制裁伊朗并在霍尔木兹保持封锁,禁止任何物品进出伊朗港口。
朝鲜批评美韩联合军演
快讯正文
朝鲜外务省称8月17日开始的乙支自由之盾联合军演是侵略战争预演。
CME美联储观察
快讯正文
9月维持3.50%—3.75%利率概率65.2%,加息25个基点概率34.8%;10月维持概率50.1%。
OpenAI年化营收据称超过400亿美元
快讯正文
知情人士称OpenAI当前年化营收已超过400亿美元,较2025年底约翻倍,主要受AI编程软件业务推动。
美国对进口无人机及部件加征关税
快讯正文
特定敏感无人机及关键部件100%,部分小型无人机25%;欧盟、日本、列支敦士登、韩国、瑞士15%,英国10%;主要措施签署21天后生效。
美联储暂停准备金管理目的国债买入
快讯正文
未来一个月暂停以管理银行体系准备金为目的的美债购买;截至9月14日仍再投资约170亿美元到期本金,并称不代表货币政策立场改变。
ADNOC称两艘船只通过霍尔木兹时遭袭
快讯正文
ADNOC称两艘船只周四通过霍尔木兹海峡时遭袭,无人员受伤报告。
美股三大指数收涨
快讯正文
道指+0.13%至53840.08,标普500+0.65%至7799.15,纳指+0.81%至26803.03。
国际油价13日下跌
快讯正文
WTI 9月合约81.25美元/桶,跌2.43%;布伦特10月合约87.07美元/桶,跌2.15%。
美元指数收于99.964
快讯正文
8月13日美元指数收于99.964,日跌0.05%;欧元/美元1.1529,美元/日元159.51。
美国30年期国债竞拍得标利率5.216%
快讯正文
8月13日30年期国债竞拍得标利率5.216%,前值5.058%。
伊朗称可能升级冲突
快讯正文
伊朗最高领袖顾问称,若条件得不到满足,最高领袖已作出升级冲突的战略决策。
欧洲主要股指涨跌不一
快讯正文
DAX -0.14%,英国富时100 -0.59%,CAC40 -0.28%,欧洲斯托克50 +0.21%。
柴油裂解价差升破98美元
快讯正文
在有报道称胡塞袭击沙特阿美炼油厂后,柴油裂解价差升破98美元,创历史新高。
胡塞称袭击沙特阿美炼油厂
快讯正文
也门胡塞控制的萨巴通讯社称,以两架无人机袭击沙特吉赞的沙特阿美炼油厂。
霍尔木兹商业交通受限
快讯正文
英国海事贸易组织称商业交通仍处受限水平;同期称伊朗革命卫队继续骚扰和监视商船,但报告期内无已确认攻击。
乌克兰提议黑海民用目标停火
快讯正文
消息人士称乌克兰向俄罗斯提出停止在黑海袭击平民目标的提议,尚未收到俄方回复。
美国天然气库存增幅超预期
快讯正文
截至8月7日当周EIA天然气库存增加360亿立方英尺,预期320亿;天然气期货跌幅一度达3%。
美联储哈玛克对通胀持续性保持谨慎
快讯正文
近期两份通胀报告令人鼓舞,但不能确信趋势持续;需关注私人信贷、AI泡沫、就业数据噪声和国债杠杆。
美联储巴尔金称加息与否仍未确定
快讯正文
关税、石油等冲击可能消退,也可能需要需求走弱或加息以恢复2%通胀目标。
美国7月PPI低于预期
快讯正文
PPI月率0%,预期0.2%;年率4.7%,预期4.9%。
美国初请失业金人数升至20.9万人
快讯正文
截至8月8日当周初请失业金人数20.9万人,预期20.2万人;四周均值19.9万人。
LME铜铝库存下降
快讯正文
铜库存207725吨,较前日减少4400吨;铝库存250000吨,减少1700吨。
中国继续对印度单模光纤征收反倾销税
快讯正文
自8月14日起继续征收反倾销税,实施期限5年。
事实参考
以下为事实表、数据对照、账户细项与来源口径,默认折叠;需要核对数据时展开。
美股 / ETF / 公开文章事实
美股 / ETF / 公开行情
| 标的 | IBKR 当前价 | 较前交易日 | 盘后/收盘后 | 上一交易日收盘 | 今日常规收盘 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT | 495.60 | +0.64% | -0.26% | 492.43 | 496.88 |
NVDA | 225.36 | +0.57% | +0.03% | 224.09 | 225.30 |
MRVL | 224.17 | +3.27% | +0.90% | 217.08 | 222.18 |
GFS | 52.97 | -0.39% | +0.53% | 53.18 | 52.69 |
APLD | 30.72 | -1.38% | +0.33% | 31.15 | 30.62 |
USAR | 18.68 | +1.47% | +0.38% | 18.41 | 18.61 |
SOXX | 549.90 | +0.60% | -0.15% | 546.61 | 550.74 |
SOXL | 144.43 | +1.60% | -0.64% | 142.16 | 145.36 |
FTXL | 239.79 | +1.07% | -0.00% | 237.25 | 239.79 |
PSI | 151.50 | +0.35% | -0.07% | 150.97 | 151.61 |
DRAM | 57.12 | +4.23% | +0.33% | 54.80 | 56.93 |
KMEM | 18.52 | +4.22% | -0.38% | 17.77 | 18.59 |
VRT | 287.50 | -0.30% | +0.15% | 288.36 | 287.07 |
COHR | 326.70 | -8.14% | -0.16% | 355.64 | 327.23 |
CRCL | 75.53 | +5.96% | +0.20% | 71.28 | 75.38 |
SPCX | 141.91 | -2.90% | +0.44% | 146.15 | 141.29 |
GOOG | 343.95 | +0.46% | +0.00% | 342.37 | 343.94 |
NBIS | 258.98 | -0.08% | +1.54% | 259.20 | 255.04 |
PLTR | 177.95 | +4.04% | -0.59% | 171.04 | 179.01 |
美股事实与文章索引
| 标的 | IBKR 当前价 | 较前交易日 | 盘后/收盘后 | 文章数 | 数据缺口 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT | 495.60 | +0.64% | -0.26% | 8 条 | - |
NVDA | 225.36 | +0.57% | +0.03% | 8 条 | - |
MRVL | 224.17 | +3.27% | +0.90% | 8 条 | - |
GFS | 52.97 | -0.39% | +0.53% | 8 条 | - |
APLD | 30.72 | -1.38% | +0.33% | 8 条 | - |
USAR | 18.68 | +1.47% | +0.38% | 8 条 | - |
SOXX | 549.90 | +0.60% | -0.15% | 8 条 | - |
SOXL | 144.43 | +1.60% | -0.64% | 8 条 | - |
FTXL | 239.79 | +1.07% | -0.00% | 8 条 | - |
PSI | 151.50 | +0.35% | -0.07% | 8 条 | - |
DRAM | 57.12 | +4.23% | +0.33% | 8 条 | - |
KMEM | 18.52 | +4.22% | -0.38% | 8 条 | - |
VRT | 287.50 | -0.30% | +0.15% | 8 条 | - |
COHR | 326.70 | -8.14% | -0.16% | 8 条 | - |
CRCL | 75.53 | +5.96% | +0.20% | 8 条 | - |
SPCX | 141.91 | -2.90% | +0.44% | 8 条 | - |
GOOG | 343.95 | +0.46% | +0.00% | 8 条 | - |
NBIS | 258.98 | -0.08% | +1.54% | 8 条 | - |
PLTR | 177.95 | +4.04% | -0.59% | 8 条 | - |
入选文章原文与摘要
英伟达探索芯片资产融资
重要性5/5 高
内容直接关联NVDA及AI资本开支融资,涉及潜在需求扩张和信用风险两条重要路径;证据仍停留在早期讨论。
中文摘要
核心结论
文章称,英伟达(NVIDIA,NVDA)CEO Jensen Huang正与高盛、贝莱德、黑石、KKR、阿波罗和Brookfield等机构探索约5000亿美元的人工智能基础设施融资框架,潜在结构可能以数据中心GPU(图形处理器)产生的收入或资产价值作为证券化基础。方案仍处早期,借款人偿付能力、芯片折旧速度和英伟达可能承担的担保责任决定其风险边界。
重要性评级
评级:5/5(高)
文章直接涉及NVDA、超大规模云服务商资本开支和AI基础设施融资,可能影响芯片需求与信用风险判断,但方案尚未正式落地,评级主要来自主题重要性而非已实现财务影响。
关键事实
- Motley Fool发布时间为美东时间 08/13 21:50(UTC+8 08/14 09:50)。
- 文章称,微软、Alphabet、亚马逊和Meta等超大规模云服务商今年资本开支可能超过7000亿美元,并计划在明年继续增加投入。
- 英伟达正与高盛、贝莱德、黑石、KKR、阿波罗及Brookfield讨论筹集约5000亿美元,为AI实验室、企业和AI云服务商建设数据中心及采购设备提供资金。
- KKR数字基础设施负责人表示,相关结构可以把GPU产生的收入或风险拆分后出售给投资者;英伟达可能逐笔为贷款提供四分之一担保。
- 借款人需要使用英伟达偏好的系统架构;文章称,在借款方无法继续运营时,其他公司可能接手基础设施。
- 作者将潜在风险与2008年抵押贷款支持证券(MBS)损失作类比,重点关注抵押资产价值、私人信贷赎回压力和芯片使用寿命。
作者观点与证据
文章把英伟达公开释放的融资方向、机构高管在媒体上的表述和历史证券化经验结合起来,认为该框架可能成为AI基建融资的新渠道。5000亿美元规模、英伟达担保安排和芯片寿命风险仍来自早期讨论或作者推演;文中明确指出协议细节尚未确定,也未确认正式启动。
与相关标的的关系
NVDA是直接相关标的。融资若最终落地,可能扩大客户采购GPU和建设数据中心的资金来源;英伟达若承担部分担保,也会增加其与客户信用和GPU残值相关的风险敞口。文章同时涉及微软、Alphabet、亚马逊、Meta及多家金融机构,但没有提供这些公司的新增财务数据。
时效性与限制
文章发表于08/13,距离报告日较近,但内容主要是早期方案讨论。证券化结构、贷款担保比例、抵押资产估值、锁定期及芯片折旧会以正式协议和监管披露为准;作者关于2008年风险的比较属于分析框架,不能替代已签署交易文件。
后续跟踪
- 英伟达及合作金融机构是否公布正式融资协议和资产范围。
- 英伟达担保责任、借款人资格与违约处置安排。
- GPU折旧年限、二手价值和数据中心现金流覆盖情况。
- 超大规模云服务商资本开支与GPU采购订单的后续变化。
英文原文
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Just Introduced a Bold $500 Billion Plan to Potentially Create Chip-Backed Securities. What Could Go Wrong?
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Just Introduced a Bold $500 Billion Plan to Potentially Create Chip-Backed Securities. What Could Go Wrong?
Bram Berkowitz, The Motley Fool
Fri, August 14, 2026 at 9:50 AM GMT+8 5 min read
- NVDA
+0.54%
In 1970, Ginnie Mae first introduced the concept of a mortgage-backed security (MBS) , a financial asset backed by a pool of mortgages that serves as collateral and passes its cash flows to investors.
It marked the birth of asset-backed securitization, which would spread to a wide range of assets, including auto loans, personal loans, student loans, and a broad swath of commercial loans.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
Now, Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang has a bold plan to launch what essentially amounts to chip-backed securities, with the collateral being graphics processing units (GPUs).
Huang is planning to partner with major Wall Street firms to create these financial instruments to continue fueling the AI build-out. What could go wrong?
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. Image source: Nvidia.
Turning to private credit
Thus far, much of the AI build-out has been made possible by the hyperscalers' balance sheets. Companies like Microsoft , Alphabet , Amazon , and Meta Platforms have long been cash-generating machines.
But in recent years, they've depleted much of their free cash flow, raised equity, and turned to debt to fund what looks set to surpass $700 billion in capital expenditures this year, with plans to ramp that higher next year.
Now, Huang and a group of top private credit players on Wall Street, including Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), BlackRock , Blackstone , KKR , Apollo , and Brookfield , are teaming up to potentially find the necessary funding for the continued build-out.
While still in its infancy, the plan is for Nvidia to partner with these firms to raise $500 billion in capital that key stakeholders in the AI ecosystem could tap to keep building data centers and purchase the necessary equipment that makes the data centers operational.
AI labs, enterprises, and AI cloud players would be able to obtain this capital at attractive rates, according to a press release from Nvidia. And while the concept isn't fully fleshed out, it sounded like the capital would be raised from investors who buy securities backed by the GPUs in data centers.
"You can think about it as a revenue stream, and you can securitize it or effectively divide that risk and sell it to investors who want to participate anywhere in that stack," Waldemar Szlezak, KKR's head of digital infrastructure, said during a CNBC panel.
Story Continues
Huang added that the compute provided by Nvidia is "broadly adopted, flexible across models and workloads, fungible and transferable across customers and operators, and continuously improved through CUDA software -- extending its useful life and improving its economics over time."
Interestingly, Nvidia said it may, on a case-by-case basis, offer to guarantee a quarter of each loan, which could lead to better interest rates for its partners.
However, borrowers will need to use Nvidia's preferred system architecture, so another company could take over the infrastructure if the borrower no longer has the means to continue operating it.
"You're starting to see, in a sense, you know, asset-based financing against this infrastructure build-out," Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon told CNBC. "That's not surprising because these are real assets. They have real value."
What could go wrong?
A plan like this could make investors nervous because it bears remnants from the Great Recession.
In 2008, pools of collateralized mortgages that went bad led to huge losses in MBSes, which rippled through the market. It's not necessarily the financial structure of an asset-backed security that's bad; it's the collateral behind these instruments that could lose value.
During the Great Recession, no one thought housing prices would go down, but they eventually did. Furthermore, having Nvidia backstop the loan also puts the whole system at risk if something were to happen to Nvidia.
Private credit funds can also face redemption requests, so the structure of these deals is likely to feature lock-up provisions. Investors may also have an issue with Huang's statement about extending the useful lives of its chips.
Many of the bears have already argued that the hyperscalers are not properly accounting for depreciation, as chips will have shorter lifespans than they claim due to the regular release of new chip models.
It's still early, and the details of these future financing agreements are far from ironed out or even officially in motion. But it's certainly an interesting development to keep an eye on, as finding the funding for the continued build-out of AI infrastructure is key to the AI trade.
Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now?
Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut are built for long-term growth and could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $400,209 ! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,375,393 !
That performance is why people listen. With a track record of beating the S&P 500 by 4x , Stock Advisor offers a distinct advantage. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor , and join an investing community built for the long haul.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2026.
Bram Berkowitz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield Asset Management, Goldman Sachs Group, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Just Introduced a Bold $500 Billion Plan to Potentially Create Chip-Backed Securities. What Could Go Wrong? was originally published by The Motley Fool
AI云营收暴增扩产承压
重要性5/5 高
文章提供NBIS最新季度增长、资本开支、融资和产能目标,直接影响对AI云扩张质量及执行风险的阅读优先级。
中文摘要
核心结论
Nebius(NBIS)第二季度收入和调整后EBITDA快速增长,AI云业务占集团收入98%,客户预付款、长期订单和更高的电力目标支撑扩张计划。与此同时,季度资本开支达到57亿美元,全年资本开支指引为200亿至250亿美元,公司仍依赖预付款、股权融资、资产支持债务和场址建设执行。
重要性评级
评级:5/5(高)
文章直接覆盖NBIS最新季度业绩、AI算力产能、融资和项目审批,事实密度高,且增长质量与资本强度同时影响日报判断。
关键事实
- GuruFocus发布时间为美东时间 08/13 21:07(UTC+8 08/14 09:07);资料标注财报发布日为08/12。
- 第二季度集团收入5.82亿美元,同比增长454%、环比增长46%;Nebius AI收入5.75亿美元,同比增长514%,占集团收入98%。
- 6月底年化收入运行率达到30亿美元,同比增长598%、较3月底增长58%;调整后息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)为2.36亿美元,利润率41%,高于第一季度的32%,并扭转上年同期亏损2100万美元。
- 第二季度资本开支约57亿美元,期末现金及现金等价物80亿美元,季度经营现金流23亿美元。
- 第二季度约70%的已签交易含预付款,管理层预计2026年客户预付款将带来超过90亿美元前置资金;公司通过自动柜员机式股票发行计划(ATM)发行1270万股A类股,按224美元加权平均价格募集约28亿美元。
- 公司7月宣布7.75亿美元资产支持债务工具,定价为担保隔夜融资利率(SOFR)加250个基点;管理层还提到超过400亿美元已承诺积压订单。
- 公司重申2026年集团收入30亿至34亿美元、年化收入运行率70亿至90亿美元、调整后EBITDA利润率约40%以及资本开支200亿至250亿美元的指引。
- 公司把年末签约电力目标提高至5吉瓦,计划2027年起每年建设超过1吉瓦;Vineland数据中心场址的公开听证会延期且未投票,可能延迟建设节奏。
- 管理层称四笔标志性交易平均规模超过10亿美元,首轮算力拍卖价格比Blackwell芯片历史最高价高15%;相关客户和容量计划仍需建设、交付与监管审批兑现。
作者观点与证据
文章由GuruFocus整理电话会信息,正面证据包括收入、利润率、预付款、订单、融资和电力目标;负面部分来自场址审批、资本开支、股权稀释和新业务早期阶段。公司对2027年定价、资产轻模式和代理推理服务的展望属于管理层判断,正式指引和实际产能交付仍待后续验证。
与相关标的的关系
NBIS直接受AI云需求、GPU采购、数据中心上线、电力取得、客户预付款和融资成本影响。收入增速和EBITDA改善显示已上线产能的商业化强劲;57亿美元季度资本开支、200亿至250亿美元全年指引以及对外部资金的依赖,显示扩张规模与执行风险同样突出。
时效性与限制
文章发表于08/13,资料引用08/12发布的季度信息,时效性较高。季度收入主要受第一季度新增产能贡献,2026年多数新增产能要到下半年上线;Vineland听证会未完成表决,ATM发行和客户预付款也会影响股本结构与现金流质量。
后续跟踪
- 2026年下半年新增GPU和数据中心产能的上线时间。
- 5吉瓦签约电力目标、Vineland审批及2027年每年1吉瓦建设计划。
- 客户预付款、400亿美元积压订单与实际收入确认的转换率。
- 资本开支、ATM发行、资产支持债务和调整后EBITDA现金转化。
英文原文
Nebius Group NV (NBIS) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Revenue Surges 454% as AI Capacity ...
Nebius Group NV (NBIS) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Revenue Surges 454% as AI Capacity ...
GuruFocus News
Fri, August 14, 2026 at 9:07 AM GMT+8 9 min read
- NBIS
-1.60%
This article first appeared on GuruFocus .
- Revenue: Group revenue grew 454% year over year to $582 million in Q2 2026, up 46% from the previous quarter.
- Nebius AI Revenue: Increased 514% year over year to $575 million, representing 98% of group revenue.
- Annualized Run Rate Revenue: Reached $3 billion at the end of June, up 598% year over year and up 58% from $1.9 billion at the end of March.
- Adjusted EBITDA: Group adjusted EBITDA was $236 million, compared to a loss of $21 million a year ago and $129.5 million in Q1.
- Adjusted EBITDA Margin: Group adjusted EBITDA margin was 41%, up from 32% in Q1. The Nebius AI business generated adjusted EBITDA of $236 million at a margin of 50%.
- Capital Expenditures: Approximately $5.7 billion in Q2, driven primarily by purchases of GPUs, GPU-related hardware, and data center expansion.
- Cash Position: Ended the period with $8 billion in cash and cash equivalents, with operating cash of $2.3 billion in the quarter.
- Customer Prepayments: Roughly 70% of deals closed in Q2 included an upfront prepayment; total customer prepayments will bring in more than $9 billion of upfront funding this year.
- ATM Equity Program: Issued 12.7 million Class A shares at a weighted average price of $224 per share, generating gross proceeds of approximately $2.8 billion.
- Debt Facility: Announced a $775 million asset-backed debt facility in July, priced at a modest spread over benchmark rates.
- 2026 Guidance: Reaffirmed full-year guidance: annualized run rate revenue of $7 billion to $9 billion, group revenue of $3 billion to $3.4 billion, group adjusted EBITDA margin of approximately 40%, and capital expenditures of $20 billion to $25 billion.
- Warning! GuruFocus has detected 10 Warning Signs with NBIS.
- Is NBIS fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator.
Release Date: August 12, 2026
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript .
Positive Points
- Revenue surged 454% year-over-year to $582 million, with Nebius AI growing 514% and ARR reaching $3 billion.
- Adjusted EBITDA turned positive at $236 million with a 41% margin, up from a loss a year ago and 32% in Q1.
- Closed four landmark deals averaging over $1 billion each, with yields of $20-$25 million per megawatt and prepayments covering 50-60% of CapEx.
- Launched a successful capacity auction clearing at 15% above the highest price ever charged for Blackwell chips, signaling strong market pricing.
- Introduced an asset-light partnership model that unlocks new capacity with minimal balance sheet capital, attracting dozens of partner inquiries.
- Raised year-end contracted power target to 5 gigawatts, positioning Nebius to build over 1 gigawatt of new capacity annually by 2027.
- Secured $775 million asset-backed debt facility at a mid-single-digit rate, backed by $40 billion in contracted backlog, diversifying funding sources.
Story Continues
Negative Points
- Q2 revenue growth was driven by capacity added in Q1, but most 2026 capacity comes online in H2, so near-term revenue impact is limited.
- The Vineland, New Jersey data center site faced a public hearing adjournment without a vote, creating potential delays despite management confidence.
- Capital expenditures remain heavy at $5.7 billion in Q2, with full-year guidance of $20-$25 billion, requiring significant external funding.
- The company relies heavily on customer prepayments (70% of deals) and ATM equity issuance, which could dilute shareholders if used extensively.
- Asset-light model and new initiatives like Token Factory are still early stage, with uncertain contribution to revenue and margins.
- The company's ability to scale capacity in 2027 depends on successful execution of complex build-outs and regulatory approvals, which carry execution risks.
Q & A Highlights
Q : How should investors frame 2027 across capacity, pricing, and revenue, and when will you formalize an outlook? A : CFO Dado Alonso Sanchez stated that deals closed this quarter, with more than $20 million per megawatt pricing and less than 2-year payback periods, will start coming online from late Q4 and onwards, serving as a baseline for pricing early next year. The company could have sold out its planned 2027 capacity today but is choosing not to, reflecting confidence in future pricing dynamics. Nebius will deploy significantly more capacity in 2027 than in 2026, and the dynamics across capacity and pricing make them "extremely excited" about 2027. Formal guidance will be provided later this year, with the asset-light model and high-value services like agentic and inference solutions expected to contribute an increasing share of revenue at higher margins.
Q : Can you characterize how the landmark deal announcements (Reflection, Cohere, a scaled US new lab, and a large US quant trading firm) ran and why these customers chose Nebius? A : CRO Marc Boroditsky explained that all four deals, averaging over $1 billion each, were competitive wins following a similar pattern. Customers chose Nebius based on scale, performance, and reliability, viewing the company as a long-term partner. In one example, a customer introduced by a strategic partner was looking for a large-scale, contiguous GB300 cluster and cited Nebius's responsiveness, transparency, white-glove support, and ability to provide current US deployment needs as well as future sovereign expansion as key differentiators. All wins were earned through multiple engagement cycles, with customers validating technology through hands-on POCs. Nebius is already in discussions with these customers for additional capacity, next-generation chips including Vera Rubin, and inference solutions like Token Factory.
Q : Given the sentiment around gigawatt-scale data center build-out, what gives you confidence in the capacity ramp, and can you provide an update on the development timeline? A : Chief Infrastructure and Product Officer Andrey Korolenko stated that Nebius is raising its year-end contracted power target to 5 gigawatts, with almost all of that power coming online over the next 3 to 3.5 years. This has been achieved through regional expansion and a mix of grid power and behind-the-meter power, including hundreds of megawatts of behind-the-meter generation already secured. The partnership with Bloom Energy allows Nebius to unlock and expedite many sites. The vast majority of contracts are cloud contracts, providing flexibility to deliver within a region and reducing dependency on any single location. Over-provisioning capacity remains the highest priority, with the approach being to deploy and build in advance as much as possible.
Q : The market is moving quickly with prices increasing. How do the new initiatives (auction, asset-light model, short-term deals) fit into the broader long-term strategy? A : CEO Arkady Volozh explained that the business model and platform allow Nebius to evolve rapidly with the market. The strategy of building capacity in advance without preselling it allows the company to allocate capacity to shorter-term, high-margin contracts as prices rise. The first capacity auction, which cleared at 15% above the highest price ever charged for Blackwell chips, was possible because of free unallocated capacity and the multi-tenant platform. The asset-light partnership model, where partners finance, build, and operate facilities while Nebius brings the full-stack platform and demand, addresses the industry's capital and capacity constraints. This model unlocks new capacity for 2027 and beyond with high-margin revenue requiring minimum balance sheet capital.
Q : Debt markets have been volatile and all-in costs have moved higher. Are you still comfortable leaning on debt, or should we expect greater use of equity through the ATM or a convertible? A : CFO Dado Alonso Sanchez stated the approach is to match the right financing instrument with the right assets while remaining disciplined on cost of capital, minimizing shareholder dilution, and maintaining a strong balance sheet. Customer prepayments remain the first source of capital, with more than $9 billion of upfront prepayments expected in 2026. The $775 million asset-backed facility completed in July, priced at SOFR plus 250 basis points, demonstrates strong demand for financing contracted cash flows even in volatile markets. With more than $40 billion of committed backlog, this is a highly scalable and repeatable financing model. Nebius also has flexibility through corporate-level debt (currently almost none) and equity-linked financing, and is actively considering further options while remaining comfortable with its funding position.
Q : How do you think about the mix of allocating 2027 capacity between short-dated capacity versus multiyear deals? Is there a threshold of ACV per megawatt for longer-dated deals? A : CRO Marc Boroditsky clarified that midterm contracts (1-3 years) are the core AI cloud business, locking in strong unit economics, while shorter-term opportunities (up to 6 months) are premium deals capturing higher value. The strategy is to optimize across customer type, price, payment structure, duration, and deal size rather than strictly looking at a single metric. Current priorities are taking care of existing customers, followed by new logos, then terms in order of price, upfront prepayment, and duration. Nebius has tactically shortened how far in advance it sells capacity, selling closer to deployment, which has improved pricing while preserving agility. A portion of capacity is deliberately allocated for short-term needs where the highest potential for combined realized value currently exists.
Q : xAI has begun selling compute at premium prices. What does that say about market pricing for AI capacity, and are you seeing similar strength on new contracts and renewals? A : CEO Arkady Volozh stated that Nebius plays in the same market as the three big hyperscaler clouds, which is growing massively from hundreds of billions to potentially a trillion dollars per year. While existing players will continue to grow with the market, there is an opening for independent players like Nebius. The company plans to build 1 gigawatt of capacity per year, but the market as a whole is growing by tens of gigawatts annually, and hyperscalers cannot build all of it. New players entering the market don't change the market for Nebius; they actually validate it. Volozh emphasized that Nebius's part is to build the rest of the market that hyperscalers cannot cover.
Q : Is your strong positioning in open-weight driving increased inference among clients? A : Chief Business Officer Roman Chernin stated that customers, businesses, and society benefit from competition and diversity, and Nebius is committed to an open AI ecosystem without lock-in. Companies at the frontier of AI adoption are asking whether AI can solve tasks with economics that allow it to scale,
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript .
温和通胀缓解加息压力
重要性5/5 高
发布时间接近报告日,覆盖通胀、联储政策、长端利率和股市,且与MSFT及跨资产市场直接相关。
中文摘要
核心结论
路透社市场综述认为,美国7月生产者价格未变,令市场暂时降低了近期加息押注;股票与债券同步走强,但美联储官员对通胀和就业的判断仍有分歧,利率路径尚未确定。
重要性评级
评级:5/5(高)
文章同时覆盖通胀、联储政策、债券、黄金、汇率和大型科技股,对跨资产日报的宏观背景价值较高。
关键事实
- 路透社发布时间为美东时间 08/13 17:02(UTC+8 08/14 05:02);标普500指数(S&P 500)上涨约0.7%并创收盘新高,纳斯达克上涨约0.8%,微软(Microsoft,MSFT)在文中上涨0.90%。
- 美国7月生产者价格指数(PPI)环比未变,市场对首次完整计入加息的时间推迟至12月。
- 克利夫兰联储主席Beth Hammack仍主张当前加息;里士满联储主席Thomas Barkin认为就业市场脆弱,通胀可能自行回落。
- 美国30年期国债拍卖需求偏弱,收益率触及2000年代以来高位;美元兑日元仍接近160,原油下跌2%,黄金下跌1%。
- 英国第二季度国内生产总值增长0.4%,第一季度增长0.6%;SocGen预计英国下半年季度平均增速仅0.1%,全年增速约1.1%。
作者观点与证据
作者把7月PPI、联储官员讲话和债券拍卖结果放在同一市场框架中,认为数据暂时减轻了加息压力。相关判断有官方经济数据和官员公开表态支撑;英国下半年增速、黄金复苏及美伊冲突影响等部分包含作者分析或机构预测,证据强度低于已公布数据。
与相关标的的关系
MSFT在当日市场快照中上涨0.90%,文章没有提供微软经营层面的新催化。对MSFT和标普500的直接关联主要来自利率预期、长端收益率和大型科技股估值环境;黄金、美元/日元与国债收益率则构成跨资产观察背景。
时效性与限制
文章发表于08/13,内容聚焦当日市场收盘前后的数据与评论。PPI只有单月读数,且两位联储官员立场相反;市场对12月加息的定价仍会随零售销售、密歇根大学消费者及通胀预期等后续数据变化。
后续跟踪
- 美联储官员对加息时点和就业脆弱性的后续表态。
- 美国零售销售与密歇根大学通胀预期数据。
- 30年期国债收益率、黄金、原油和美元兑日元走势。
- 标普500及大型科技股对利率预期变化的反应。
英文原文
Trading Day: Hiking pressure eases
Trading Day: Hiking pressure eases
By Jamie McGeever
Fri, August 14, 2026 at 5:02 AM GMT+8 4 min read
- ^GSPC
+0.65%
- MSFT
+0.90%
By Jamie McGeever
ORLANDO, Florida, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Stocks and bond prices rose on Thursday, with the S&P 500 barreling to a fresh high, as investors cheered another relatively benign snapshot of U.S. inflation that reduces the pressure on the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates.
In my column today, I look at what's driving gold's revival. Uncertainty around the U.S. rate outlook, Fed independence and credibility, just as the U.S.-Iran war is flaring up again, has drawn investors back to gold, especially one group — central banks.
If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today.
1. U.S. producer prices unchanged in July, further dimming rate hike odds
2. AI creeps onto Fed radar, but footprint is small so far: Mike Dolan
3. EXCLUSIVE-Microsoft retreats in China, but AI boom helps it keep a window open
4. AI boom is starting to show in UK economy's performance
5. Rate hike bets leave yen's post-intervention gains at BOJ's mercy
Today's Key Market Moves
• STOCKS: South Korea +3.6%, set to snap 7-week losing streak. UK -0.5%. S&P 500 +0.7% to new high, Nasdaq +0.8%.
• SECTORS/SHARES: Seven sectors on the S&P 500 rise, four fall. Comms services +1.6%, materials -0.7%. Workday +18%, Sandisk +13%, Netflix +5%. Tapestry -16%, Cisco Systems -8%.
• FX: Dollar little-changed vs majors, USD/JPY still eyeing 160. Colombian peso biggest gainer, +0.8%.
• BONDS: U.S. 30-year auction on the soft side, yield highest since the 2000s, as expected.
• COMMODITIES/METALS: Oil -2%, gold -1%.
Today's Talking Points:
Battle lines drawn
If you were hoping this week's CPI and PPI reports would give some degree of clarity on the U.S. inflation outlook, you'd be disappointed. Both were relatively benign, especially the PPI data, raising the likelihood that the Fed sits on its hands a little bit longer. A rate hike isn't fully priced now until December.
Comments from two Fed officials on Thursday reflected the "hawkish" and "wait-and-see" camps at the central bank. Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack repeated her view that rates should be raised now if inflation is to finally get back to target, while Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin said the labor market is vulnerable and inflation may already be drifting lower on its own. Paralysis or pause? Markets don't seem to care — stocks and bonds are on the up.
Another OpenAI departure
OpenAI's chief revenue officer Denise Dresser is leaving less than a year after joining, "to pursue other opportunities." She will be replaced by Dali Rajic, who joins from Wiz, and brings "deep expertise in running disciplined, metrics-led revenue organizations that scale globally and selling to both large enterprises and technical customers," OpenAI said on its website.
Story Continues
Investors may be wondering, with a potential $1 trillion IPO in the pipeline, why Dresser is leaving after barely eight months in the job. They will also note that the announcement of her departure comes two days after senior executive Brad Lightcap said he would leave the company.
Brit-pop higher
Britain's economy unexpectedly grew in June, boosted by the World Cup, hot weather and respite from the Middle East energy shock. The leap in June meant GDP rose by 0.4% in the second quarter, following 0.6% in the first. This means Britain is on course for the strongest growth in the G7 over the first half of the year.
Will this continue into the second half of the year? Unlikely. SocGen's Sam Cartwright forecasts just 0.1% average Q/Q growth in the second half, which would leave 2026 GDP at 1.1%. JPMorgan's Allan Monks is slightly more optimistic, saying risks to Q3 growth lie to the upside, especially if PMIs sustain their recent improvement.
What could move markets tomorrow?
• Taiwan GDP (Q2, revised)
• Germany producer price inflation (July)
• Euro zone GDP (Q2, flash estimate)
• U.S. retail sales (July)
• U.S. University of Michigan consumer, inflation expectations (August, prelim)
Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for my newsletter here. Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
(Reporting by Jamie McGeever; Editing by Nia Williams)
美国7月生产者价格趋稳
重要性5/5 高
BLS官方数据发布时间新、事实密度高,涵盖服务、能源、原材料和核心价格分项,对利率与估值讨论具有广泛关联。
中文摘要
核心结论
美国7月最终需求生产者价格指数环比持平,服务和建筑价格上涨抵消商品价格下降;剔除食品、能源和贸易服务后环比上涨0.4%,同比上涨4.7%。数据显示价格压力在能源商品端缓和,但服务及部分中间投入仍保持较高涨幅。
重要性评级
评级:5/5(高)
该数据由BLS(美国劳工统计局)官方发布,发布时间新、覆盖通胀结构和能源价格,并可作为利率、企业成本与成长股估值讨论的宏观输入。
关键事实
- BLS于美东时间 08/13 08:30(UTC+8 08/13 20:30)发布2026年7月生产者价格指数报告。
- 7月最终需求指数环比持平,6月下降0.1%;未经季节调整的同比涨幅为4.7%。
- 最终需求服务价格上涨0.2%,建筑价格上涨2.2%;最终需求商品价格下降0.7%。
- 剔除食品、能源和贸易服务后,最终需求价格环比上涨0.4%,同比上涨4.7%。
- 最终需求能源价格下降3.1%,汽油价格下降5.7%;机动车和设备价格上涨0.3%。
- 投资组合管理服务价格上涨6.5%,货运卡车运输价格下降1.8%。
- 中间需求加工品价格下降0.6%,未加工品下降1.8%,服务价格上涨0.5%;未加工能源材料价格下降7.4%,原油价格指数下降11.9%。
- 3月至6月部分数据因迟报和申报方更正而修订,报告下次发布安排在09/10,具体时刻未在本摘要中展开。
作者观点与证据
这是BLS的统计发布,不包含投资立场或企业管理层叙事。报告的主要证据是季节调整后的月度价格变动、未经季节调整的同比数据以及分项指数;汽油、原油和能源价格下行拉低商品端涨幅,服务、建筑和剔除部分项目后的价格仍然上升。
与相关标的的关系
US-PPI是宏观数据标的,直接用于观察美国生产成本和批发价格压力。服务价格与剔除食品、能源和贸易服务后的指标可能影响利率预期和成长股估值讨论,能源和原油分项则关联商品及能源企业的成本与收入环境;报告没有指向特定公司或股票代码。
时效性与限制
报告于08/13发布,数据对应07月,属于最新月度观察,但同比指标未经季节调整,月度指标经过季节调整;3月至6月数据已因迟报和更正出现修订,因此历史比较可能继续变化。PPI反映生产端价格,不能单独代表消费者端通胀或货币政策路径。
后续跟踪
- 8月最终需求及剔除食品、能源和贸易服务后的价格变化。
- 服务、建筑与商品价格上涨或下降的持续性。
- 汽油、原油和未加工能源材料价格是否继续压低商品端指数。
- 后续修订对3月至7月通胀趋势的影响。
英文原文
Producer Price Index News Release summary
Economic News Release
SHARE ON:
PRINT:
PPI
Producer Price Indexes
×
- PPI Homepage
- PPI Overview
- PPI FAQs
- Contact PPI
Close
Producer Price Index News Release summary
Transmission of material in this release is embargoed until USDL 26-1380
8:30 a.m. (ET) Thursday, August 13, 2026
Technical information: (202) 691-7705 ppi-info@bls.gov www.bls.gov/ppi
Media contact: (202) 691-5902 * PressOffice@bls.gov
PRODUCER PRICE INDEXES - JULY 2026
The Producer Price Index for final demand was unchanged in July, seasonally adjusted, the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Final demand prices edged down 0.1 percent in June
and rose 0.5 percent in May. (See table A.) On an unadjusted basis, the index for final demand
increased 4.7 percent for the 12 months ended in July.
In July, a 0.2-percent increase in the index for final demand services and a 2.2-percent advance
in prices for final demand construction offset a 0.7-percent decrease in the index for final
demand goods.
Prices for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services rose 0.4 percent in July after
inching up 0.1 percent in June. For the 12 months ended in July, the index for final demand less
foods, energy, and trade services advanced 4.7 percent.
Final Demand
Final demand services: Prices for final demand services advanced 0.2 percent in July after rising 0.5
percent in June. The July increase can be traced to the index for final demand services less trade,
transportation, and warehousing, which moved up 0.6 percent. Conversely, the indexes for final
demand transportation and warehousing services and for final demand trade services decreased 1.8
percent and 0.1 percent, respectively.
Product detail: Leading the July increase in prices for final demand services, the index for portfolio
management advanced 6.5 percent. Margins for health, beauty, and optical goods retailing;
automobiles and automobile parts retailing; lawn, garden, and farm equipment and supplies retailing;
food and alcohol retailing; and food and alcohol wholesaling also moved higher. In contrast, prices
for truck transportation of freight fell 1.8 percent. The indexes for machinery and vehicle wholesaling
and for securities brokerage, dealing, and investment advice also decreased. (See table 2.)
Final demand goods: The index for final demand goods fell 0.7 percent in July after moving down
1.4 percent in June. A major factor in the July decrease was a 3.1-percent decline in prices for final
demand energy. The index for final demand foods moved down 0.9 percent. Conversely, prices for
final demand goods less foods and energy increased 0.1 percent.
Product detail: More than half of the July decrease in the index for final demand goods can be
attributed to a 5.7-percent decline in prices for gasoline. The indexes for fresh and dry vegetables,
diesel fuel, jet fuel, residual fuels, and thermoplastic resins and materials also fell. In contrast, prices
for motor vehicles and equipment moved up 0.3 percent. The indexes for electric power and for
grains also increased.
Table A. Monthly and 12-month percent changes in selected final demand price indexes, seasonally adjusted
Month
Total
final
demand
Final
demand
less
foods,
energy,
and
trade
Final demand goods
Final demand services
Change
in final
demand
from 12
months
ago
(unadj.)
Change
in final
demand
less
foods,
energy,
and
trade
from 12
mo. ago
(unadj.)
Total
Foods
Energy
Less
foods
and
energy
Total
Trade
Transportation
and
warehousing
Other
2025
July
0.8
0.7
0.6
1.2
0.7
0.4
0.9
1.2
1.4
0.7
3.2
2.9
Aug.
-0.2
0.3
0.2
-0.1
-0.2
0.4
-0.3
-2.1
0.6
0.3
2.7
3.0
Sept.
0.6
0.2
0.6
0.8
2.0
0.2
0.6
1.6
0.7
0.2
3.0
3.0
Oct.
0.1
0.6
-0.2
-0.4
-2.2
0.5
0.2
-0.9
0.0
0.7
2.8
3.5
Nov.
0.4
0.3
0.8
0.1
3.4
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.8
0.2
3.1
3.6
Dec.
0.4
0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-1.5
0.4
0.6
1.8
0.2
0.0
3.1
3.4
2026
Jan.
0.6
0.5
-0.1
-1.3
-1.7
0.7
0.9
2.0
1.0
0.3
3.1
3.5
Feb.
0.5
0.5
1.0
2.3
2.0
0.4
0.3
-0.3
0.8
0.5
3.4
3.5
Mar. ( 1 )
0.8
0.2
2.0
-0.6
10.5
0.4
0.3
0.5
2.2
0.0
4.3
3.6
Apr. ( 1 )
1.1
0.5
1.9
0.2
7.2
0.7
0.8
1.5
3.7
0.1
5.7
4.4
May ( 1 )
0.5
0.8
2.3
0.6
8.2
0.8
-0.3
-3.1
2.1
0.7
5.9
5.0
June ( 1 )
-0.1
0.1
-1.4
-0.5
-6.5
0.2
0.5
1.4
-0.5
0.2
5.5
5.0
July
0.0
0.4
-0.7
-0.9
-3.1
0.1
0.2
-0.1
-1.8
0.6
4.7
4.7
Footnotes
(1) Some of the figures shown above and elsewhere in this release may differ from those previously reported because data for March through June have been revised to reflect the availability of late reports and corrections by respondents.
Intermediate Demand by Commodity Type
Within intermediate demand in July, the index for processed goods declined 0.6 percent, prices for
unprocessed goods fell 1.8 percent, and the index for services rose 0.5 percent. (See tables B and C.)
Processed goods for intermediate demand: The index for processed goods for intermediate
demand moved down 0.6 percent in July after decreasing 1.1 percent in June. Leading the decline in
July, prices for processed energy goods fell 3.1 percent. The index for processed foods and feeds
decreased 0.5 percent. Conversely, prices for processed materials less foods and energy edged up 0.1
percent. For the 12 months ended in July, the index for processed goods for intermediate demand
rose 9.9 percent.
Product detail: Over half of the July decrease in the index for processed goods for intermediate
demand can be traced to prices for diesel fuel, which moved down 6.7 percent. The indexes for jet
fuel, basic organic chemicals, gasoline, thermoplastic resins and materials, and meats also fell. In
contrast, prices for lumber increased 5.0 percent. The indexes for lubricating oil base stocks and for
commercial electric power also moved higher.
Unprocessed goods for intermediate demand: Prices for unprocessed goods for intermediate
demand declined 1.8 percent in July after falling 6.4 percent in June. The July decrease can be
attributed to the index for unprocessed energy materials, which dropped 7.4 percent. Conversely,
prices for unprocessed nonfood materials less energy and for unprocessed foodstuffs and feedstuffs
moved up 1.6 percent and 0.7 percent, respectively. For the 12 months ended in July, the index for
unprocessed goods for intermediate demand increased 7.1 percent.
Product detail: Leading the July decline in prices for unprocessed goods for intermediate demand,
the index for crude petroleum fell 11.9 percent. Prices for fresh vegetables (except potatoes),
nonferrous metal ores, slaughter steers and heifers, raw milk, and slaughter hogs also moved lower.
In contrast, the index for aluminum base scrap increased 5.8 percent. Prices for grains and for natural
gas also advanced.
Table B. Monthly and 12-month percent changes in selected intermediate demand price indexes for goods by commodity type, seasonally adjusted
Month
Processed goods for intermediate demand
Unprocessed goods for intermediate demand
Total
Foods
and
feeds
Energy
goods
Less
foods
and
energy
Total,
change
from 12
months
ago
(unadj.)
Total
Foodstuffs
and
feedstuffs
Energy
materials
Nonfood
materials
less
energy
Total,
change
from 12
months
ago
(unadj.)
2025
July
0.7
-0.2
2.2
0.4
2.1
1.3
0.7
1.9
1.5
0.2
Aug.
0.4
0.6
0.2
0.4
2.6
-1.8
-0.4
-4.3
-0.5
1.7
Sept.
0.2
0.7
0.1
0.2
3.7
-0.5
0.4
-2.8
1.2
3.6
Oct.
-0.1
-1.6
-0.6
0.2
3.1
-1.3
-1.8
-4.1
3.3
-0.6
Nov.
0.6
-0.3
3.0
0.1
3.6
2.4
-0.3
3.9
4.5
2.0
Dec.
0.1
-1.0
-2.4
0.8
3.5
2.1
-2.2
6.9
2.2
1.0
2026
Jan.
0.1
-0.3
-1.2
0.5
2.8
4.3
-3.0
13.4
3.8
-0.1
Feb.
1.5
0.2
5.0
0.8
4.0
5.9
4.4
11.5
1.0
5.4
Mar. ( 1 )
3.0
0.6
12.8
0.8
6.9
-0.2
0.8
-1.2
0.8
9.5
Apr. ( 1 )
2.7
0.4
7.4
1.6
9.5
1.7
0.2
5.1
-0.4
15.0
May ( 1 )
2.9
0.6
7.5
1.8
12.6
3.1
4.0
2.9
2.4
20.6
June ( 1 )
-1.1
0.2
-7.0
0.6
11.3
-6.4
-3.7
-12.5
-1.7
10.3
July
-0.6
-0.5
-3.1
0.1
9.9
-1.8
0.7
-7.4
1.6
7.1
Footnotes
(1) Some of the figures shown above and elsewhere in this release may differ from those previously reported because data for March through June have been revised to reflect the availability of late reports and corrections by respondents.
Services for intermediate demand: The index for services for intermediate demand rose 0.5 percent
in July following a 0.7-percent increase in June. Most of the July advance can be traced to prices for
services less trade, transportation, and warehousing for intermediate demand, which moved up 0.6
percent. Margins for trade services for intermediate demand rose 0.7 percent. Conversely, the index
for transportation and warehousing services for intermediate demand fell 0.5 percent. For the 12
months ended in July, prices for services for intermediate demand increased 5.1 percent.
Product detail: Over one-third of the July advance in the index for services for intermediate demand
is attributable to prices for portfolio management, which rose 6.5 percent. The indexes for internet
advertising sales, food and alcohol wholesaling, management consulting services, machinery and
equipment parts and supplies wholesaling, and the U.S. Postal Service also moved higher. In contrast,
prices for truck transportation of freight decreased 1.8 percent. The indexes for business loans
(partial) and for building materials, paint, and hardware wholesaling also declined.
Table C. Monthly and 12-month percent changes in selected intermediate demand price indexes for services by commodity type, seasonally adjusted
Month
Services for intermediate demand
Total
Trade
Transportation
and
warehousing
Other
Total, change
from 12 months
ago (unadj.)
2025
July
0.6
1.3
0.9
0.3
1.9
Aug.
0.0
-1.9
0.3
0.5
1.9
Sept.
0.3
1.5
0.4
-0.1
2.0
Oct.
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.4
2.2
Nov.
0.2
1.0
0.6
-0.1
2.5
Dec.
0.6
1.6
0.7
0.3
2.7
2026
Jan.
0.6
2.2
0.5
0.2
3.2
Feb.
0.3
-0.1
0.7
0.4
3.3
Mar. ( 1 )
0.1
0.2
0.6
-0.1
3.0
Apr. ( 1 )
0.9
1.0
3.1
0.4
4.3
May ( 1 )
0.4
-1.2
1.0
0.7
4.7
June ( 1 )
0.7
2.1
-0.3
0.5
5.3
July
0.5
0.7
-0.5
0.6
5.1
Footnotes
(1) Some of the figures shown above and elsewhere in this release may differ from those previously reported because data for March through June have been revised to reflect the availability of late reports and corrections by respondents.
Intermediate Demand by Production Flow
Stage 4 intermediate demand: Prices for stage 4 intermediate demand increased 0.6 percent in July
after moving up 0.3 percent in June. In July, the index for total services inputs to stage 4 intermediate
demand rose 0.9 percent, and prices for total goods inputs advanced 0.3 percent. (See table D.)
Increases in the indexes for portfolio management; machinery and equipment parts and supplies
wholesaling; food and alcohol wholesaling; management consulting services; metals, minerals, and
ores wholesaling; and grains outweighed falling prices for gasoline, diesel fuel, and gross rents for
retail properties. For the 12 months ended in July, the index for stage 4 intermediate demand rose 6.7
percent.
Stage 3 intermediate demand: Prices for stage 3 intermediate demand edged down 0.1 percent in
July following a 0.2-percent decline in June. In July, the index for total goods inputs to stage 3
intermediate demand decreased 0.2 percent, while prices for total services inputs were unchanged.
Declines in the indexes for diesel fuel, basic organic chemicals, slaughter steers and heifers, raw
milk, and business loans (partial) outweighed advances in prices for grains; the U.S. Postal Service;
management consulting services; and hay, hayseeds, and oilseeds. For the 12 months ended in July,
the index for stage 3 intermediate demand increased 5.8 percent.
Stage 2 intermediate demand: The index for stage 2 intermediate demand fell 1.0 percent in July
after declining 1.7 percent in June. In July, prices for total goods inputs to stage 2 intermediate
demand dropped 2.8 percent. Conversely, the index for total services inputs rose 0.3 percent.
Decreasing prices for crude petroleum, thermoplastic resins and materials, business loans (partial),
natural gas liquids, diesel fuel, and jet fuel outweighed advances in the indexes for internet
advertising sales; natural gas; and hay, hayseeds, and oilseeds. For the 12 months ended in July,
prices for stage 2 intermediate demand moved up 7.6 percent.
Stage 1 intermediate demand: The index for stage 1 intermediate demand inched down 0.1 percent
in July following a 0.5-percent decline in June. In July, prices for total goods inputs to stage 1
intermediate demand fell 0.6 percent. In contrast, the index for total services inputs increased 0.5
percent. Decreases in prices for basic organic chemicals, diesel fuel, primary nonferrous metals,
gasoline, and truck transportation of freight outweighed advances in the indexes for portfolio
management, grains, aluminum base scrap, and internet advertising sales. For the 12 months ended in
July, prices for stage 1 intermediate demand rose 9.7 percent.
Table D. Monthly percent changes in selected intermediate demand price indexes by production flow, seasonally adjusted
Month
Stage 4 intermediate
demand
Stage 3 intermediate
demand
Stage 2 intermediate
demand
Stage 1 intermediate
demand
Total
Goods
inputs
Services
inputs
Total
Goods
inputs
Services
inputs
Total
Goods
inputs
Services
inputs
Total
Goods
inputs
Services
inputs
2025
July
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.7
1.0
0.4
0.5
0.9
0.2
0.9
0.8
1.1
Aug.
0.2
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
-0.6
-1.3
-0.1
0.0
0.2
-0.2
Sept.
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.1
-0.1
0.3
-0.1
-0.6
0.2
0.4
0.5
0.4
Oct.
0.3
0.2
0.5
-0.2
-0.9
0.3
-0.2
-1.0
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.5
Nov.
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.6
2.2
-0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
Dec.
0.6
0.2
0.9
0.1
-0.5
0.6
1.7
3.2
0.6
0.4
-0.1
0.7
2026
Jan.
0.6
0.2
1.0
0.2
-0.4
0.7
1.9
4.5
0.3
0.9
0.8
0.9
Feb.
0.7
0.9
0.6
0.8
1.8
-0.2
2.2
5.0
0.4
1.1
1.8
0.3
Mar. ( 1 )
0.4
0.9
-0.1
1.4
2.4
0.5
0.8
1.9
0.0
1.7
3.0
0.2
Apr. ( 1 )
0.9
1.1
0.6
1.7
2.4
1.0
2.1
3.7
1.0
2.3
3.2
1.1
May ( 1 )
1.0
1.4
0.7
1.7
2.9
0.5
1.6
3.8
0.2
2.6
4.2
0.6
June ( 1 )
0.3
-0.1
0.6
-0.2
-1.0
0.5
-1.7
-5.2
0.8
-0.5
-1.5
0.8
July
0.6
0.3
0.9
-0.1
-0.2
0.0
-1.0
-2.8
0.3
-0.1
-0.6
0.5
Footnotes
(1) Some of the figures shown above and elsewhere in this release may differ from those previously reported because data for March through June have been revised to reflect the availability of late reports and corrections by respondents.
________________
The Producer Price Index news release for August 2026 is scheduled to be published on Thursday,
September 10, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. (ET).
Technical notes
Table 1. Producer price index percent changes and weights for Final Demand - Intermediate Demand groupings, seasonally adjusted
Table 2. Producer price index percent changes for selected commodity groupings by Final Demand - Intermediate Demand category, seasonally adjusted
Table 3. Producer price indexes Final Demand - Intermediate Demand groupings, seasonally adjusted
HTML version of the entire news release
The PDF version of the news release
News release charts
Supplemental Files Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Last Modified Date: August 13, 2026
数字美元平台扩张提速
重要性5/5 高
这是CRCL最新季度经营与平台战略材料,包含业绩、USDC网络、Arc主网和CPN变现等直接影响公司估值的事实。
中文摘要
核心结论
Circle第二季度电话会显示,USDC(美元稳定币)流通量、链上交易量和支付网络规模继续增长,公司同时把资源投入Arc区块链、机构支付和代理经济基础设施。收入仍受储备收益率影响,Arc代币预售收入和后续平台变现包含较强的管理层预期,尚未等同于已实现经营收入。
重要性评级
评级:5/5(高)
文章直接覆盖CRCL最新季度业绩、监管资质、USDC网络指标、Arc发布计划和收入指引,是判断公司平台化扩张与收入结构变化的重要材料。
关键事实
- Motley Fool发布时间为美东时间 08/12 10:00(UTC+8 08/12 22:00);电话会日期为美东时间 08/05 08:00(UTC+8 08/05 20:00)。
- 第二季度末USDC流通量为733亿美元,同比增长19%;季度平均流通量创纪录,达到765亿美元;每日链上交易量平均1630亿美元,同比增长151%。
- 总收入及储备收入为7.01亿美元,同比增长7%;调整后息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)为1.43亿美元,同比增长8%,利润率为50%;储备收益率为3.48%,同比下降66个基点。
- USDC在6月占稳定币交易量接近70%,去年第二季度为36%;Circle拥有55项以上牌照和注册资质,覆盖35条区块链、185个国家,并有超过150家分销合作伙伴。
- Arc主网计划于09/16启动;测试网已处理超过5亿笔交易,覆盖近300万个钱包,私有主网已有超过100家合作方。
- 公司称Arc代币第二季度预售收入为2.42亿美元,主网上线前相关资产规模达到30亿美元;预计2026年约75%的里程碑可确认收入,并将其中1.8亿美元纳入修订后的指引,其他收入指引上调至3.10亿至3.30亿美元。
- Circle支付网络(CPN)第二季度末近30日年化支付量接近150亿美元;截至07/31已达230亿美元,网络覆盖超过58个国家、175家金融机构。
- Circle称,USDC与x402(链上机器支付协议)占代理支付的99.3%,代理市场已有超过900项付费服务;公司还宣布与DTCC(美国存托与结算机构)、BlackRock(贝莱德)合作推进代币化证券和BUIDL基金上链。
作者观点与证据
电话会管理层把USDC流通、交易量、监管资质、CPN增长和Arc合作视为网络效应证据,并提出跨周期40%的多年复合增长目标。财务数字和平台规模来自公司季度披露;Arc收入确认、CPN变现、代理经济增长及稳定币市场规模属于管理层展望,且记录由Motley Fool整理,存在转录遗漏或错误可能。
与相关标的的关系
CRCL直接受USDC流通量、储备收益率、分销成本、支付网络变现和Arc收入确认影响。高流通量与交易量支持网络扩张,储备收益率下降会压缩相关收入;Arc主网09/16上线、CPN变现和新的机构合作将决定平台收入能否从储备收入延伸出去。
时效性与限制
文章发表于08/12,但电话会发生在08/05,部分信息距离报告日已有数天。Arc主网、代币预售里程碑收入、CPN变现和监管进程均包含未来条件;管理层未披露部分USDC分销成本与平台混合结构,季度利润率的可预测性受到收入组合变化影响。
后续跟踪
- Arc主网09/16上线、验证者参与和交易活动。
- 1.8亿美元Arc相关收入的里程碑确认进度。
- USDC流通量、储备收益率和分销成本变化。
- CPN支付量增长与下半年实际收费情况。
英文原文
Circle (CRCL) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
Circle (CRCL) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
Motley Fool Transcribing, The Motley Fool
Wed, August 12, 2026 at 10:00 PM GMT+8 46 min read
- CRCL
+5.75%
Image source: The Motley Fool.
DATE
Wednesday, Aug. 5, 2026 at 8:00 a.m. ET
CALL PARTICIPANTS
- Head of Strategic Finance - Scott Blair
- Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman - Jeremy Allaire
- Chief Financial Officer - Jeremy Fox-Geen
Full Conference Call Transcript
Scott Blair: Good morning, and welcome to Circle's Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. I'm Scott Blair, Circle's Head of Strategic Finance. Earlier this morning, we posted our earnings press release and earnings presentation on the Circle Investor Relations website, investor.circle.com. A transcript of this call will be posted on that website once available. I need to remind everyone that our earnings press release, presentation in this call contain statements that are forward-looking. Because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified and some of which are beyond our control, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events.
Information containing risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause these results to differ is included in our SEC filings. Additionally, nothing in this presentation constitutes an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities or an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity. We will also disclose non-GAAP financial measures on this call today. Definitions of those non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations can be found in the earnings release and earnings presentation, which are posted on investor.circle.com. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for GAAP measures.
Today, I'm joined by Jeremy Allaire, our Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman; and Jeremy Fox-Geen, our Chief Financial Officer, who will walk us through Q2 results. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Jeremy Allaire.
Jeremy Allaire: Thank you, Scott. I'm excited to be here with all of you today to discuss Circle's second quarter results. As I've done in the past, I want to begin at a higher level and put in context where we are and what is driving Circle's strategy. We are living through a global moment. Around the world, governments, financial institutions and businesses are embracing digital dollars. Stablecoins are becoming federally regulated digital dollar money in the United States and similar frameworks are taking hold in major markets all around the world. This is the moment Circle has been building toward for more than a decade. That moment has drawn enormous attention and with it, competition. I want to address that directly.
Story Continues
Circle is in a position of significant leadership. We have built deep and durable competitive moats around trust, liquidity, regulatory standing, technology and network scale. Our position has never been stronger. At the center of that position is USDC and the extraordinary network we have built around it. That network was built with partners, including a strategic partnership with Coinbase that we have grown over many years, and I'm pleased to share today that our agreement with Coinbase has renewed on its existing terms, ensuring that USDC remains central across all of Coinbase's products. At the same time, we look forward to continuing to grow our USDC network through distribution arrangements with strategically aligned partners.
Let me start with the foundations of that network. USDC is the leading stablecoin network in the world, and it rests on significant technology and operational infrastructure. Circle and our stablecoin infrastructure are the most widely regulated in the industry. We hold over 55 licenses and registrations across major jurisdictions. That position took years to establish and is what ensures the legal availability of our infrastructure around the world, something that will take others many years to replicate. The software infrastructure that powers this open network runs on every major blockchain technology, spanning 35 blockchain networks and reaching users in 185 countries.
We provide the critical protocols and on-chain smart contracts that make digital dollars work seamlessly wherever users are in whatever application they are using in a safe way. This is unparalleled in the industry. Alongside all of this, the financial infrastructure underneath USDC includes more than 15 partner banks around the world from some of the largest global systemically important banks to critical fintech-focused banks, ensuring the liquidity that underpins our network. We have also built a network of more than 150 distribution partners that have an economic interest in embedding USDC, growing USDC and supporting it across their commercial platforms. This is expanding and accelerating.
And critically, thousands of other companies are also part of our network with products and services that have integrated USDC and use our infrastructure. They span every sector, wallets, DeFi protocols, payment apps, banks, neobanks, asset managers, exchanges, custodians, trading firms, brokerages and large enterprises. These companies have built and continue to build fundamental utility around USDC. That strength is evident even in recently announced purported consortium projects. Approximately 70% of the companies that have expressed interest are already participants on our network. Whatever role they may ultimately play in those projects, the more important fact is that they are already building on, distributing and supporting USDC today. Our network is not theoretical or aspirational.
It is the largest, deepest and most widely integrated in the industry, and its scale creates powerful self-reinforcing network effects that will be extraordinarily difficult to replicate. Liquidity is essential to those network effects and to Circle's competitive position. On a primary basis, we have scaled USDC minting and redemption all around the world. In the second quarter, we saw an average of $1.9 billion of daily minting and redemption, up 105% year-over-year. This is infrastructure that works at scale. On a secondary basis, several billion dollars of USDC trades every day, making USDC one of the most liquid digital currencies in the world.
And transaction volume on the network continues to grow robustly with daily on-chain transaction volume averaging $163 billion per day in Q2, up 151% year-over-year. This liquidity is what makes digital dollars work in markets, in payments and across business applications. Turning to the quarter. I want to focus on a few key highlights. We ended the quarter with $73.3 billion of USDC in circulation, representing approximately 20% year-over-year growth. Total revenue and reserve income was $701 million. Adjusted EBITDA margin demonstrated continued healthy profitability and transactional volume with USDC grew 151% year-over-year to nearly $15 trillion. We also saw expansion of our platform.
In a huge milestone, we received our OCC National Trust Bank charter and shortly thereafter, an additional limited purpose trust charter from the State of New York. And as announced today, we have major strategic partners coming alongside us for the Arc Mainnet launch, which is happening this quarter on September 16. In another milestone, global systemically important banks began offering USDC minting and redemption directly to their institutional clients. Our payments network, CPN, continued to see very robust growth, reaching nearly $15 billion in annualized total payment volume on a trailing 30-day basis at the end of Q2.
And we continue to build out and strengthen flagship partnerships from global banks to major regional financial technology players, payments companies and global financial firms. I want to spend a moment on the National Trust Bank because it represents something foundational. With final OCC approval, we have established Circle National Trust, an infrastructure bank for the Internet financial system. This is about confidence. Circle National Trust gives leading companies and financial institutions a federally supervised foundation on which to build digital asset services. It allows us to bring core elements of USDC into this new federally supervised framework.
And it becomes a way to project Circle's infrastructure into global markets for payments, for capital markets and for use of digital dollars in corporations all around the world. Now moving on to details of our stablecoin network and digital asset growth and adoption. Digital asset markets themselves have continued to see significant weakness. Even so, we saw overall growth on a year-over-year basis and continue to maintain our market share position. More importantly, real-world payment volumes building on digital dollars have continued to scale, growing 84% year-over-year. USDC continues to be the leader in stablecoin transaction volumes. In fact, according to Visa, USDC share of stablecoin transaction volume reached nearly 70% in the month of June, a new record.
Key measures of usage and liquidity have continued to grow. USDC on-chain transaction volume grew 151% year-over-year. While volume was down from the first quarter, which included significant activity from market makers, we continue to see steady growth in transactional utility. At the same time, we are seeing record amounts of minting and redemption of USDC with mint and redeem volume reaching $170 billion in Q2. This underscores USDC's critical and valuable role supporting payments and settlement moving between fiat infrastructure around the world. We are truly building fundamental new pipes for digital dollar movement globally. And while much of the focus is on USDC, we continue to hold market-leading positions across our other digital assets.
EURC grew 2.2x year-over-year and remains the largest digital euro in the world. USYC grew 10x year-over-year to become over $3 billion in assets and remains the largest tokenized money market fund in the world. I also want to talk about the significant evolution happening in digital trading markets and Circle's role in it. Perpetual futures have become one of the most important tradable instruments in the world. The market has evolved from people buying and selling Bitcoin into people trading these perpetual futures at global scale. On the largest centralized and decentralized platforms in the world, Binance and Hyperliquid, USDC's position has continued to strengthen, reaching 40% of open interest collateral in these markets.
And there is a real shift happening in what people are trading. The market is moving away from speculating on cryptocurrencies and into open global digital asset markets that support trading tokenized stocks, tokenized commodities and other tokenized assets. In fact, for the first time, the majority of traded volume on Hyperliquid, one of the most important venues in the world, is now in real-world assets rather than digital commodities and cryptocurrencies, reaching nearly 75% of Perp's volume as of last week. This is a major change in the structure of the market, and Circle is very well positioned as the leading provider of stablecoin infrastructure to these markets.
We are also seeing dramatic growth in prediction markets as a major source of digital asset trading activity. Spot volume on Polymarket grew more than 8x year-over-year, and open interest posted in these markets grew more than 4x year-over-year. Polymarket is a strategic distribution partner for USDC, which underpins this activity. Now let me turn to Arc. Arc is coming, and we are excited to announce today that Arc Mainnet will launch this quarter on September 16. We have seen tremendous traction as the infrastructure gets ready for this moment. Our Testnet has processed more than 0.5 billion transactions across nearly 3 million wallets with nearly perfect uptime.
And more than 100 partners are already active on our private Mainnet, preparing for the public launch. Crucially, Arc has been built as financial infrastructure to be run by the leading financial firms in the world. Today, we are announcing the initial cohort of firms that will operate the Arc blockchain network alongside Circle as network validators. This includes the world's leading asset manager, the world's leading equities and securities clearing firm, leading digital asset firms, the largest exchange group in the world, the 2 largest retail payments networks in the world, leading banks from around the world and leading payment processors and remittance companies. This is an incredible group, running infrastructure that others can build on.
No other blockchain has been built with this kind of strength. It is an amazing milestone, and we are thrilled for the launch in the coming weeks. Alongside the Mainnet launch, we are announcing 2 major partnerships today. The first is with DTCC. DTCC underpins so much of our equities and securities markets today, and DTCC is collaborating with Circle to bring tokenized securities to Arc, focusing first on enabling the tokenization of DTC-custodied assets on Arc. Over time, this extends to broader capabilities, tokenized repo, collateral mobility, corporate actions, securities lending, dividend distribution and participant reporting. This reflects Arc's infrastructure model, purpose-built for financial institutions with deterministic settlement finality, configurable privacy and a network operated by financial infrastructure companies.
DTCC will participate in running the Arc Layer-1 network and DTC tokenized assets will carry the same protections, rights and safeguards that investors receive with traditionally held assets. The second partnership is with BlackRock, who plans to deploy BUIDL on Arc to leverage our infrastructure with native USDC integration. This enables institutional investors to subscribe, redeem and deploy fund assets within a single on-chain environment, removing friction that has historically limited tokenized fund adoption at scale. Institutional fund management meets a network built for financial markets and stablecoin native settlement. We could not be more excited about these 2 partnerships. Turning to payments. We continue to see tremendous progress with CPN.
At the end of Q2, annualized total payment volume reached nearly $15 billion on a trailing 30-day basis. That is tremendous growth on a year-over-year basis and on a quarter-over-quarter basis. We continue to enroll new financial institutions into the network with nearly 30% quarter-over-quarter growth, reaching 175 financial institutions and the momentum has continued. Sitting here today, as of July 31, annualized total payment volume on a trailing 30-day basis has already reached $23 billion, representing 130% growth since our last earnings report. Alongside this growth, we are making major progress in product and market expansion. CPN and our related payments products are rolling out across international markets and now reach more than 58 countries.
Our core operations infrastructure is enabling much more seamless onboarding for financial institutions with stronger operational tooling. And all of this is being integrated across our full stack, including Arc, Circle Mint and our new stable FX venue. We're incredibly excited about this progress, and we are excited about beginning to monetize CPN. I want to close the product discussion with agentic finance, where we are seeing emerging traction with Circle's agent stack. In the coming days, we will be publishing a white paper and our near-term road map for the agentic economy.
We are moving from a world where blockchains, stablecoins and digital wallets are the rails that agents can pay with to a world where agents can earn and monetize. Already today, the USDC network alongside payment protocols like x402 handles 99.3% of agentic payments. More than 900 paid services are already available in our agent marketplace. As we go forward, we see a world where more and more agents conduct work and a labor market emerges for those agents. A developer can build and deploy an agent in minutes. That agent has its own identity. It can be discovered easily by other agents, and agents can monetize their services directly on chain.
Reputation, trust and discovery are all critical to how the agent economy will evolve, and we are excited to lay out our road map for building and delivering this in the second half of this year. Our work on agentic infrastructure is also unfolding inside of Circle. We are building toward operating an agentic corporation. In the first half of this year, we proved adoption at scale. 86% of our employees are weekly active users of AI tools. Our employees have shipped more than 1,100 AI apps this year, most of them over the course of Q2 and most by nontechnical builders. Hundreds of agent skills have been published into an integrated circle AI toolkit available across the company.
And we now have continuous agent run software development with product development velocity up several hundred percent over the first half of the year. In the second half, we are moving from adoption at scale to orchestration at scale. We are standing up infrastructure where hybrid teams of agents and humans operate, working together as one. Underneath that, we'll sit a company brain with memory and orchestration between humans and AIs and between AIs and other AIs connected by a messaging layer.
On top of that, we are rolling out agent authoring tools to every employee in every team on a self-service basis so they can build individual and cross-functional agents with highly skilled capabilities across nearly every domain in the company. And underneath it all, we're building model infrastructure that lets us optimize across any model for performance, cost and capability. All of this is bound by a robust policy, security, governance and risk layer appropriate to a global financial infrastructure company like Circle. This is a transformation in how we operate, how we build and how we deliver. We talk about the agentic economy and the emergence of on-chain agentic corporations.
That is exactly what we are building here at Circle, and we're incredibly excited about what this will enable over time. I want to conclude with where I started. This is a global moment for digital dollars. Stablecoins are becoming federally regulated digital dollar money and the world's leading financial institutions, technology companies and enterprises are moving on to this infrastructure. Circle enters this moment from a position of extraordinary strength. We operate the largest, most liquid, most widely regulated stablecoin network in the world. We have renewed and deepened our most important partnerships and the greatest firms in the world are joining us as network participants, as validators on Arc and as builders on our platform.
We are launching Arc Mainnet in a matter of weeks with a cohort of network validators no other network can match, and we're building the infrastructure for the Agentic economy while becoming an Agentic corporation ourselves. It's an incredibly exciting time to be building here at Circle, and we are thrilled with the progress we made this past quarter. With that, let me turn it over to Jeremy Fox-Geen, our CFO, to take you through the financial results.
Jeremy Fox-Geen: Thank you, Jeremy, and good morning, everyone. I'll start with a few observations that provide context for the quarter before turning to the financial results. First, as Jeremy mentioned earlier, USDC reached nearly 70% of stablecoin transaction volume in June, up from 36% in Q2 last year, reflecting the strength of our network and the trust that we've built across the ecosystem. Second, USDC circulation has remained resilient.
While the broader digital asset market capitalization declined approximately 40% year-over-year, leading to reductions in trading activity, DeFi, collateral demand and associated market maker balances, USDC circulation grew 19% over the same period, underscoring the decoupling of USDC usage from the vagaries of the digital asset markets, the resilience of USDC through that market cycle and signposting the underlying growth in non-crypto market adoption and usage. Those are the massive markets we're building for. And third, we continue to expand our infrastructure and application layers with strong growth in CPN, the upcoming launch of Arc and the approval of our National Trust Bank. These are important proof points that our strategy is taking shape.
So with that context, I'll walk you through the financial results. USDC circulation ended the quarter at $73.3 billion, up 19% year-over-year. While ending circulation moderated at quarter end, average USDC circulation reached an all-time high of $76.5 billion in the quarter. USDC held within Circle's platform infrastructure increased 106% year-over-year to $12.4 billion, representing 17% of circulation. USDC on Coinbase's platform reached 30% at quarter end, with Hyperliquid accounting for approximately 6% of that total. The reserve return rate was 3.48% for the quarter, down 66 basis points year-on-year, reflecting the decline in SOFR during the period.
Total revenue and reserve income was $701 million in the quarter, up 7% year-over-year as growth from circulation and other revenue was partially offset by lower reserve return rate during the period. Sequentially, total revenue and reserve income increased as average circulation hit an all-time high, but was partially offset by lower rates and other revenue. Other revenue was $34 million, up 1.4x year-over-year, driven by growth in blockchain partnerships. Quarter-over-quarter, other revenue declined by $8 million, reflecting both moderating blockchain revenue amid weak digital asset market conditions and our deliberate decision to prioritize Arc over other blockchain partnerships. Subscription and services revenue declined $7 million, driven by fewer blockchain integrations.
Transaction revenue declined by $1 million due to declining validator awards. Revenue less distribution cost margin was 41.2%, up 3 percentage points year-over-year, driven by our strategy to increase USDC held on our platform and grow high-margin other revenue streams. Quarter-over-quarter margin decreased 21 basis points with strong platform execution and mix optimization, partially offsetting the impact of lower other revenue. The new Hyperliquid arrangement for USDC had minimal impact on Q2 results as the migration to Coins platform ramped late in the quarter. We expect that impact to be reflected beginning in Q3. Total revenue and reserve income less distribution transaction and other costs grew 15% year-over-year to $289 million.
Adjusted operating expenses were $146 million, up 23% year-over-year, driven by continued investment in product development, go-to-market infrastructure and our AI capabilities. Sequentially, adjusted operating expenses increased $11 million in the quarter or 8% as we continue to execute against our strategy. The expenses were driven by Arc marketing spend, continued infrastructure expansion and investments in G&A. Adjusted EBITDA grew 8% year-over-year to $143 million, and adjusted EBITDA margin was 50% in the quarter. Now before turning to guidance, I want to start by addressing a question we've received around our multiyear through-cycle USDC growth framework.
As we've said before, we are building infrastructure for the next generation of the financial system, and we continue to see structural shifts taking place across regulation, international adoption, enterprise use cases, agentic finance and the broader acceptance of digital assets and blockchain technology. We believe those trends remain intact and that Circle is uniquely positioned at the center of that evolution. And we are excited about the partners actively committing to the USDC ecosystem and to the quality of institutions interested in even greater strategic partnership.
Given the magnitude of these structural shifts, our own historic growth patterns and the potential for rapid scaling characteristic of Internet platform companies, we believe that a 40% growth CAGR over several years through cycle is achievable. And when we look across third-party research, they project the stablecoin market for 2030 to be between approximately $1 trillion to $4 trillion, implying compound annual growth rates of 27% to 77%. We expect that this growth will come from the massive regulated markets that make up the global economy and that the vast majority of institutions, enterprises and platforms will choose to build on compliant regulated digital dollar infrastructure. We note that our own 40% target is well within this range.
Now with that context, let me turn to the remaining components of our guidance, beginning with other revenue. We are raising our other revenue guidance range to $310 million to $330 million, up from $150 million to $170 million. The increase is driven by Arc. When we set the original range, we took a conservative view on contribution from new products. We are pleased that Arc, in particular, has been so successful and that we have been able to create a $3 billion asset even before Mainnet launch and execute a successful $242 million presale of the Arc token in Q2. We expect to recognize this token presale revenue as certain product milestones are achieved.
Based on our product road map, we expect to achieve approximately 75% of the milestones in revenue in 2026 and have included $180 million in the revised guide. As this revenue is recognized, it will flow directly to the bottom line. The remainder of our products are expected to deliver between $130 million and $150 million. This reflects our strategic decision to focus resources on the development of Arc instead of additional blockchain partnerships as well as moderation in commercial opportunities with new blockchain partners, reflecting softer digital asset markets. Turning to RLDC margin.
We are increasing our full year outlook range to 41.7% to 43.7% from 38% to 40%, reflecting our prior guidance range augmented by the addition of anticipated revenue from Arc. Excluding that Arc revenue, we expect full year RLDC margin to come in near the midpoint of the prior range. Finally, turning to adjusted operating expenses. Our guidance range of $570 million to $585 million remains unchanged, although we expect to land at the higher end of that range. Given the strength of our balance sheet and the very attractive long-term returns we expect from investing behind our platform, we believe that now is the right time to sustain this investment.
As Jeremy mentioned, this is the moment Circle has been building toward. Our financial foundation is strong, our network is growing. And in just a few weeks on September 16, we will launch Arc Mainnet with a cohort of network validators no other blockchain network can match. At the same time, we're building out the infrastructure for the agentic economy, positioning Circle at the center of how value will move in an AI-driven world. The opportunity ahead remains large, and we could not be more excited about the rest of this year and beyond. Now with that, I'll turn it back over to Scott to start the Q&A.
Scott Blair: Thanks, Jeremy. We're starting Q&A again with a few questions we collected from analysts on the Say platform. Our first question is from Norman, who asks, if we can talk to the delay of CLARITY passing.
Jeremy Allaire: Sure. I'm happy to take that, Norman. Thanks for the question. As I think a lot of people know, the CLARITY Act is very actively being discussed and kind of final issues are being worked on, I think, literally as we speak in the Senate. I think there are a few key issues that are being negotiated between the Democrats and the Republicans. I think the goal is to try and get to at least the leader of the Senate, the goal is to try and get to a motion to proceed in working on the bill on the Senate floor this week. We'll see if that happens. I think our view is a few things.
I think the first is we are seeing bipartisan work here to try and get this legislation done. And there are kind of, again, a few critical issues, but I think that they're very much resolvable. Whether they get done this week or in a subsequent convening of Congress, we'll see. But there is a genuine bipartisan effort to get this done, and I think very broad industry support and non-industry support as well. I think the second thing I'd say around this that's really important is that for Circle, the GENIUS Act, which passed a year ago, is the most critical piece of legislation.
And the GENIUS Act has just gone through its proposed rulemaking, and we know will become effective in January of 2027. I referenced that a little bit in my earlier comments. Legal digital dollars in the U.S. financial system and therefore, in the global financial system is a kind of bedrock foundation for what we're building. And so that is critical and I think allows the entire financial industry to move forward with this.
Then the third thing I'd say as well is I think there's been, I think, pretty good coverage of this, but the key regulatory agencies from the banking regulators to securities and capital markets regulators are also very proactively working on their own rule-making in this space to support kind of continued maturation and clarity of rules around how capital markets will function in this area. So obviously, we're all watching that closely.
Scott Blair: Great. Thanks, Jeremy. The second question comes from Sean, and he wants to know if we plan to roll out quarterly dividends in the near future.
Jeremy Fox-Geen: I'll take that one. The short answer is no, we don't. But let me put that in context. We have a massive opportunity ahead of us to be the leading Internet platform company as the whole world evolves from traditional technologies and rails into new Internet-based financial services built on blockchain technology. And as we've always said, we want to have a strong balance sheet to ensure that we can continue to invest against that opportunity through market cycles, no matter what comes and also so that we can be opportunistic to take advantage of great opportunities when they come up.
So with that, we believe in retaining a strong balance sheet, and we believe that the returns available to our shareholders on investing in the platform are far greater than those from sort of paying out quarterly dividends. Fundamentally, we are a massive future market growth stock versus a stock that returns capital to shareholders today.
Scott Blair: Thanks, Jeremy. Okay. Our last question from Say this quarter comes from Sreedhar, and he has a product road map question. He wants to know what's the road map for platform revenue besides passive reserve income? And what should we expect in 2026 and beyond?
Jeremy Allaire: Sure. I'm happy to take that. We've been talking now, I think, over the last year about building out these kind of 3 pillars of our platform, our digital assets pillar where USDC is central, but where we're expanding that into other digital assets, our payments pillar with CPN, which, as I've just shared, continues to grow very robustly. And then our developer infrastructure and operating system pillar with Arc. We obviously, just as discussed, we are already seeing, I think, significant other revenue growth. And in fact, from the beginning of 2025 through today, we've seen that grow from essentially 0 to now a guided range of around $300 million in 2026. And so that is obviously growing.
There are multiple pieces to this. So there's the partnerships that we build around infrastructure that supports our stablecoin network expansion. There are transaction fees that are associated with use of our platform. Arc itself is multiple new sources of revenue. Obviously, we're discussing today the ARC Token and the ARC Token presale, but Arc itself includes revenue from staking, revenue from transactions that run on the network, which is revenue that Circle will be able to collect, but also that other stakeholders and validators on the network will be able to collect. And then there's also revenue associated with partnerships and incentive partnerships that we build with partners building on Arc.
So Arc is going to become a diverse set of revenue and already is in 2026, and we expect that to continue in 2027. CPN, as we've talked about, we're very excited about. We're excited about the traction and growth. We made it very clear when we launched that product that our primary focus was how do we get this platform to scale. And we're starting to see that going from essentially a brand-new product that was cleanly built internally at the company to now as of July 31, $23 billion of annualized TPV run rate payment volume. Now it is becoming the time for us to start to monetize that.
So that will start really in the second half of this year. But we have very ambitious growth goals for that network, very ambitious growth goals ultimately over the long run in terms of what revenue can be derived there. And then I think the last thing I'd say is the velocity of product development that's happening at Circle right now is incredible. I talked about the productivity that we're seeing from agentic infrastructure in our software development. That velocity is allowing us to cover more surface area. And so you will continue to see Circle expanding its product surface area. And alongside that product surface area expansion, you'll see new monetization opportunities that emerge from that as well.
So more to come as we continue to build and innovate in our platform.
Jeremy Fox-Geen: And Jeremy, if I can just add to that, I want to take a point on part of the premise of the question, which is this idea of passive reserve income. I also want to remind everybody that at $70-odd billion, we view the USDC product and the reserve income stream still is very early stage. The market -- the addressable market for money is about $120 trillion, of which about half, $60 trillion is noninterest-earning money. And so we're building an Internet platform company, as we both said in our remarks earlier. And Internet platform companies can scale incredibly rapidly into massive markets as they disrupt.
And that scaling is predicated not only on everything that we're building, but also on all of the work by all of the builders and the developers and the companies that are building products and services based on USDC to offer better products and services to their customers. So there is an awful lot of activity, not just from us, but from the entire ecosystem that's building our USDC business and the reserve income line. And that's a massive market. So we just think we're just getting going.
Scott Blair: That was great. Thanks, guys. Now before I turn it over to the moderator, I want to thank Norman, Sean, Sreedhar and everyone else who participated in our Say questionnaire this quarter. Thanks all. With that, I'm going to pass it over to Denise to begin live Q&A.
Operator: Scott. Our first question today comes from Pete Christiansen at Citi.
Peter Christiansen: Jeremy Allaire, I wanted to dig a little bit more into competitive positioning, specifically around USDC's distribution mode in light of the OUSD announcement earlier last month. The market seems to be framing this potentially as a binary issue, Open Standards model of equally sharing reserve income with all distribution partners, including Visa, potentially as a structural advantage that Circle can't replicate given its existing economics with Coinbase. But what caught our attention, I think, this quarter was the joint Hyperliquid announcement, which you spoke about earlier, where Circle and Coinbase collaborated on a share revenue agreement together.
To us, this suggests that Circle has a mechanism to deploy distribution capacity in a complementary way alongside Coinbase rather than being constrained by that relationship. I guess, can you help us understand your thinking about that framework going forward more broadly and how Circle plans to compete for distribution in a world where reserve income sharing is becoming table stakes.
Jeremy Allaire: Thanks, Pete. It's a great question. A few comments that I want to make here as well, and I touched on this a little bit in my comments. I think critically, we already have an incredible amount of distribution, distribution incentives and partners building on our network, thousands of companies, in fact, part of our network over 150 companies, we have distribution partnership agreements with that provide economic incentives to grow USDC, to build on USDC, to distribute USDC. So this is something that we've been doing for a very long time. And in fact, we do it together with Coinbase often.
And so I think getting to the other part of your question, our ability to build really great distribution, win-win distribution arrangements with major companies is absolutely there. I think you gave one example. There are certainly others. What I would say is a couple of things. The first is, and I think we heard this from Brian on his earnings call last week, Brian made it very clear. His focus is on ensuring that USDC is the #1 stablecoin in the world. It's #1 in multiple areas, and we want to make it #1 overall. I think we share that. And so it's very, very clear.
The second thing I'd say is some of the other partners who announced prospective involvement with a consortium coin also made it very clear in their own earnings calls that they're taking an agnostic approach, multi-coin, multi-chain, et cetera. And in fact, we continue to expand our relationships with these leading firms. Just today, we announced expanded collaboration with Visa and with Mastercard, who are becoming key infrastructure partners in Arc, which is USDC native in terms of its transaction infrastructure and settlement infrastructure. And so we see around 70%, in fact, of companies involved in these kind of consortium efforts already building with us.
Final comment I'd make, which I think gets to the heart of your question, which is we are seeing incredible interest from major companies in wanting to be part of the USDC network. And we see this all around the world, everywhere that we go. And we absolutely have the opportunity together with Coinbase to form partnerships where it makes sense, where we believe that a company can really materially help drive the growth and adoption of USDC. And so I think we're quite confident in the position that we have, the leadership position that we have.
And likewise, I think we have the tools that we need to continue to partner with the best companies in the world to grow together.
Peter Christiansen: Great. Our next question comes from Ken Suchoski from Autonomous.
Jeremy Allaire: Not hearing question.
Kenneth Suchoski: Guys, can you hear me?
Jeremy Allaire: Yes, now we can hear you.
Kenneth Suchoski: [indiscernible] detail on the Arc, presale and what's included in the guidance. Great to get some more detail in commentary, some type of [indiscernible] it seems like Circle [indiscernible] opportunity in that market? And then maybe just a couple of specifics around the deal. Are Circle and Coinbase [indiscernible]?
Jeremy Allaire: Sure. No problem. I can take the first part of that, and then maybe I'll have Jeremy Fox-Geen take the second part of that. I think on the first part is I think what's incredible is that a high-growth platform like Hyperliquid, which also, by the way, looked at getting behind another stablecoin project, ultimately, I think, realized that the liquidity, the network effects, the institutional preference, the global regulatory availability of USDC made it the stablecoin that they needed to get behind. And so I think the first is that it just underscores that we are winning in the market on the basis of the incredible network effects that we've already created. And so there's -- that is key.
The second, and this is very important, is when you look at certain types of distribution platforms, whether they're the biggest global exchanges or you look at which Hyperliquid effectively is, they play a really key role as what I like to call liquidity Supernovas, which is to say the liquidity that concentrates on these platforms spins out and affects distribution and availability in so many other places. And so when we think about major tenfold distribution partnerships, we think about that. What are the network effects? What is this going to do to drive preference and adoption in lots of other applications. So as a critical kind of on-chain market primitive, it's very important that, that's the case.
And so I think it's with that spirit that Circle and Coinbase together looked at, let's build this arrangement so that this important and high-growth platform, which, as I noted in the earnings call, close to 75% of the traded volume is now actually tokenized real-world assets. So this is becoming a convergence of traditional financial markets and these on-chain markets as well. It's a really critical piece for us. And so I think that's the strategic rationale behind the work there. And I'll let Jeremy address the specific financial questions as well.
Jeremy Fox-Geen: Yes. thank you, Jeremy. As it comes to the Hyperliquid arrangement itself in which both Coinbase and Circle and Hyperliquid are all participating. You can see on chain the exact location of the funds within Hyperliquid's platform in relation to where they're held within either Circle or Coinbase's platform. At quarter end, approximately 90% of Hyperliquid's total USDC was held within Coinbase's platform and about 10% of Hyperliquid's total USDC was within Circle's platform. As for the specifics of how that revenue share is detailed, we're not commenting in more detail on the precise nature of that between Circle and Coinbase.
Operator: Our next question comes from James Yaro at Goldman Sachs.
James Yaro: Jeremy, you spoke to a deliberate decision to prioritize Arc over other blockchains and that could have an impact on other revenue. I was hoping you might just expand a little bit on this decision, what this means going forward and how this changes the subscription services component of other revenue going forward.
Jeremy Allaire: Maybe I can take part of that and Jeremy Fox-Geen can take another part of that, which is I think the first is really the strategic decision, which is Arc represents one of the most massive opportunities that we've ever seen as a company. I think I maybe said on the last earnings call, we look at Arc as potentially as bigger than an opportunity than USDC itself. And so this is the birth of a new operating system layer for economic activity in the world. We believe that an incredible amount of financial activity, economic activity, agentic activity are going to move on to these operating systems.
And we believe over the next 3 to 5 years, the opportunity set exists for these to become very large-scale infrastructures on the Internet. And so I think for us, both as a 25% stakeholder in that network as well as a key operator of infrastructure in that network as well as the kind of compounding effects of that network's adoption in terms of real-world asset adoption, stablecoin adoption, transaction fees in stable coins, settlements in our stable coins, all of these pieces make it an incredibly attractive thing to invest in. And so from our perspective, that as a source of major other revenue going forward is very attractive. The margin characteristics are very attractive.
The diversification of different types of product and product SKUs that can be attached to that are very attractive as well. And so I think from our perspective, that's exactly the kind of other revenue that we want to be building, and it's a strategic infrastructure that compounds value to Circle in many, many other ways. In terms of specific commentary on what that does to other revenue over beyond 2026, I'll let Jeremy speak at a high level about that, although I'm not sure we have that much to say.
Jeremy Fox-Geen: Yes. Thank you, Jeremy. Look, the subscription and services revenue line that you asked for, as we've said, is based on the partnerships that we build with other blockchains to bring USDC and the rest of Circle's infrastructure stack to those blockchains. Those contracts have both an upfront component and a recurring component. And as we said, we've been aggressively working through a pipeline of those over the first few quarters of this year and at the back end of last year. I think we've said that consistently, and we're sort of working through those, and there's a lumpiness inherent to that because of the upfront fees. We're still prioritizing this as a service.
It's very important to us that USDC is available on the blockchains where people are building activity, and we very much value those partnerships. As what it means for the rest of the year, you can look at our other revenue guide, and you'll see the implication of that on the second half of the year.
Operator: Our next question comes from Owen Lau at Clear Street.
Owen Lau: Could you please add more color on the road map of agent -- you can hear me? Can you hear me now? Sorry.
Jeremy Allaire: There we go.
Owen Lau: Okay. Could you please add more color on the road map of agentic product in the second half of this year? When should we expect to see more revenue contribution from agentic commerce? I know it's still small. It's still growing, but we just want to understand when it can become more material to Circle longer term.
Jeremy Allaire: Thanks, Owen. It's a great question. So I talked a little bit about our second half road map in the call. And as I noted, we're actually going to be publishing a lot more detail on that in the coming days. So stay tuned for that and watch that. What I'll say specifically is -- the first set of product introductions that we've made are really around enabling agents to have wallets, enabling agents to have policies and guardrails around those wallets, enabling them to make and receive payments using open standard agentic protocols. And we've, alongside that, launched a curated agent marketplace that has -- now has 900 services in it.
What's exciting is that we continue to see organic adoption of the agentic payment stack and organic adoption of services, data providers and other agent marketplaces offering more and more services. So literally, every day, every week, we're seeing more and more of these. In fact, just yesterday, Cloudflare had a big announcement, they're making agentic wallets with x402 and USDC support available as a core part of their offering. They touch a huge percentage of the Internet. So that's very exciting. We're seeing this organically happen. In terms of the second half and sort of the materiality, there are a number of really key things.
And our vision is that agents basically begin to take on more cognitive work and agents conduct and execute services and labor. And in order to do that, sort of these agents as services need to be able to have identity mechanisms. They need to be able to have automated discovery mechanisms, so agents can basically seamlessly discover other agents and their capabilities. And they need reputational systems like the reputation systems that we've seen in Internet marketplaces and platforms where you have reputation that is based on prior engagement like a page rank on Google as an example.
And then finally, you need very simple ways for someone who builds an agent to enable their agent to just earn to earn and monetize their work. And so we're doing -- we're working on all of those things. And I think we'll outline in detail what that looks like. But we want this whole agentic economy to function. We want to enable agents to be providers of services to other agents and to companies around the world. And each one of those capabilities, our approach is to do it through open standards. And so this is not a proprietary circle thing.
We want all of this to be based on open standards and obviously collaborating with the incredible ecosystem that we already have today. In terms of direct impact on revenue, I mean, very clearly, we believe over time, the amount of stablecoin money that is held and used in agentic applications will grow and the velocity of transactions will grow. And we are ensuring that Arc as an infrastructure is an ideal infrastructure. It is an economic operating system that is designed to work with these intelligence operating systems and agentic systems. And so driving utility, transaction volume and assets on Arc directly accrues to revenue to Circle as well.
So we see the agentic stack as driving some revenue around the protocols themselves, but fundamentally driving stablecoin adoption, which drives revenue and driving Arc infrastructure adoption, which drives revenue as well.
Operator: Our next question comes from Ken Worthington at JPMorgan.
Kenneth Worthington: Can you talk about distribution and transaction costs associated with USDC on Circle platform? I can't tell for sure, but it looks like costs specific to Circle on Platform USDC came down a lot from 1Q to 2Q. Did I get that right? And if so, how did the mix of USDC on Circle Platform change? And how is mix change, including CPN, impacting what you're seeing in terms of distribution costs to win Circle on-platform USDC?
Jeremy Fox-Geen: I'll take that one, and Ken, thank you for the question. You're asking a very detailed question, and we don't give disclosure at the level of margin and mix within our platform and within the totality of USDC. But in general, I think what you're seeing happening, and you can tell that from our guide is the overall margin, you can tell from the guide and what we printed in the first half of where we're seeing that coming out. And we've always said there's a lot of puts and takes inherent in that mix.
When you think of how USDC is used across the entire digital asset ecosystem and increasingly outside of the digital asset ecosystem and both on and off platform, there are pockets of heavily incentivized USDC. There are large pockets and very large dispersed surface area of USDC that carries very little incentive at all. And so within any one quarter and over any period of time, there's movements in every single one of those pockets. Now I appreciate that makes it very, very hard to forecast margin quarter-on-quarter, and that's the world we're inhabiting in. Now we feel very comfortable with our year-end guide overall. We've had puts and takes through the first half.
And as we said, the trajectory is still when you back out the $180 million of expected to be recognized revenue, the trajectory of that is pretty much towards the middle of our previously guided range.
Operator: And our last question this morning comes from John Todaro at Needham.
John Todaro: I was wondering if we could spend just a little bit more time on x402. I understand USDC pretty much dominates that right now at 99% plus. There are some other competitors who are looking to launch stablecoins and operate within that. Is there sort of almost an inherent right to win for you guys within that x402 stack or even a benefit you could get from just more adoption within those payment channels?
Jeremy Allaire: Yes. I mean we think about this a lot, and thanks for the question, John. So we were an early design partner in x402. We're one of the kind of key founding members of the x402 Foundation. There's a lot of great companies that are now involved in that. And x402 effectively optimizes for on-chain payments and settlement. And I think in the agentic space, agents want actual money, so they want actual digital dollars. They want to know that the infrastructure is something that can process in fractions of a second for fractions of a cent.
They want to be able to transact where some of the transactions are as low as just a few cents themselves, and we see that in our own agentic marketplace and what people are doing with x402. So all of those things lend themselves extremely well to USDC and to the blockchain infrastructure that we provide and many of our partner networks also provide. And so we absolutely have a right to win, and we are clearly winning. And I think like other aspects of the market, where you see, for example, at the end of June, 70% of real-world stablecoin payment volume being USDC is that there are powerful network effects that exists.
And so even the LLMs as they work with the agents that are deployed on them and discover like what can I use and what's available and what are other agents using, that actually is a network effect. The intelligence layer itself is informed by the utility that exists and the scale of that, that exists. And so we feel very good about the strong position that we've already staked out there. And I think with the product stacks that are coming out of a lot of great companies, including obviously, Circle with a major push on our agent stack, we expect that to continue.
And so I think we feel very good about the right to win, the network effects and the work that we're doing to promulgate this infrastructure into the intelligence layer itself so that USDC is the preferred form of money in the agentic economy. And I guess with that, I think that's our last question. And I want to thank everyone, for joining us today on the Q2 earnings call. We're very pleased to share the results, and thanks for the question. Have a great day.
Should you buy stock in Circle Internet Group right now?
Before you buy stock in Circle Internet Group, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Circle Internet Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut are built for long-term growth and could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $403,337 ! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,334,946 !
That performance is why people listen. With a track record of beating the S&P 500 by 4x , Stock Advisor offers a distinct advantage. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor , and join an investing community built for the long haul.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 12, 2026.
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
Circle (CRCL) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript was originally published by The Motley Fool
光通信业绩分化映射需求
重要性4/5 中高
直接覆盖COHR财报及光通信产业链,提供现金流、毛利率和订单等高密度事实;盘面数据存在口径差异。
中文摘要
核心结论
文章显示,Coherent(COHR)和思科(CSCO)虽超出盈利预期,却因现金流和毛利率承压下跌;Ciena(CIEN)和诺基亚(NOK)则受数据中心互联与相干光传输需求带动上涨。市场正在区分AI光通信需求增长与企业层面的资本效率、成本和预期压力。
重要性评级
评级:4/5(中高)
文章与COHR直接相关,并提供CSCO、CIEN、NOK及NVDA供应链的横向信息;数据密度较高,但部分涨跌幅来自盘中快照,且文章存在单项价格数据不一致。
关键事实
- 文章发布时间为美东时间 08/13 13:15(UTC+8 08/14 01:15)。
- COHR第四财季收入20.5亿美元,同比增长33.74%;非通用会计准则每股收益1.74美元,高于1.612美元预期;数据中心与通信业务收入16.15亿美元,同比增长59%。
- COHR财年经营现金流仅7950万美元,同比下降87.45%;资本开支11.029亿美元,同比增长150.18%。
- CSCO收入172.5亿美元,同比增长17.6%;季度AI基础设施订单40亿美元,2026财年累计93亿美元;非通用会计准则毛利率从68.4%降至66.3%,主要受AI硬件占比和内存成本影响。
- CSCO给出的2027财年收入指引为722亿至734亿美元,AI基础设施收入指引为75亿美元。
- Lumentum管理层称,单一超大规模云服务商连接两个AI数据中心所需的网络容量,可能达到其过去十年全球骨干网建设总量的两倍,并预计未来数季度泵浦激光器出货量增长四倍。
- Ciena最近一季收入同比增长39.51%,云服务商收入占比46%且同比增长70%;Nokia第二季度AI与云收入同比翻倍以上,AI与云订单流入达32亿美元。
- 文中盘面表列COHR下跌4.39%、CSCO下跌8.48%、CIEN上涨6.04%、NOK上涨3.29%;COHR段落另列4.94%的跌幅,存在快照差异。
作者观点与证据
作者以财报数字、电话会表述和Lumentum、Ciena、Nokia的业务数据推断,数据中心互联需求正在向纯光通信供应商传导。COHR现金流、资本开支和CSCO毛利率是已披露事实;关于CIEN、NOK受益及摩根大通正面传导判断属于跨公司解读,仍需后续订单验证。
与相关标的的关系
COHR是直接相关标的,收入和数据中心通信业务增长强劲,但现金流大幅下降及高资本开支形成明显约束。CSCO反映AI硬件放量对毛利率的压力;CIEN和NOK代表数据中心互联与电信光传输方向。NVDA只作为AI基础设施需求背景出现,文章没有提供NVDA新的经营数据。
时效性与限制
文章发表于08/13,接近报告日,但股价数据是盘中或当日快照,且COHR跌幅在不同段落出现4.39%与4.94%两种表述。文章引用的公司数据和管理层观点覆盖不同财季,横向比较存在时间口径差异。
后续跟踪
- COHR经营现金流、资本开支和数据中心业务订单转化。
- CSCO AI基础设施收入增长对毛利率的持续影响。
- CIEN和NOK云客户收入、订单流入与交付节奏。
- 超大规模云服务商数据中心互联容量和光器件采购计划。
英文原文
Optics Stocks Divide: Coherent and Cisco Drop After Earnings While Nokia and Ciena Soar
Optics Stocks Divide: Coherent and Cisco Drop After Earnings While Nokia and Ciena Soar
Eric Bleeker
Fri, August 14, 2026 at 1:15 AM GMT+8 4 min read
- COHR
-7.99%
- CSCO
-8.40%
- CIEN
+2.49%
- NOK
+2.33%
- NVDA
+0.54%
Quick Read
- Coherent and Cisco beat estimates yet sold off sharply after Coherent's operating cash flow cratered 87% and Cisco's gross margin compressed to 66%.
- Ciena jumped 6% and Nokia gained 3% as those same earnings calls confirmed explosive data center interconnect demand, lifting pure-play optical vendors instead.
- Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Cisco Systems didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today .
The optics complex is splitting in two this morning. Coherent ( NYSE:COHR ) is trading down 4.94% and Cisco Systems ( NASDAQ:CSCO ) is down 8.48% after both reported fiscal fourth-quarter results last night. Yet the pure-play optical vendors that sell into the exact same demand story are green. Ciena ( NYSE:CIEN ) is up 6.04% and Nokia ( NYSE:NOK ) is up 3.29%.
Shutterstock
Margins and Cash Flow Are the Reason the Reporters Are Red
Both earnings were beats. Coherent posted revenue of $2.05 billion, up 33.74% year over year, and non-GAAP EPS of $1.74 against a $1.612consensus. The Datacenter and Communications segment hit $1.615 billion, up 59% year over year on a pro forma basis. The sore spot is the 8-K cash disclosure: fiscal 2026 operating cash flow of $79.5 million, down 87.45% year over year, against capital expenditures of $1.1029 billion, up 150.18%. Coming into the earnings report, COHR had already rallied 8.35% over the prior week, which included a steep sell-off on Monday and gains last week following reports of potential U.S. bans on Chinese transceiver shipments.
Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Cisco Systems didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today .
Cisco reported $17.25 billion in revenue, up 17.6% year over year, with $4.0 billion of AI infrastructure orders in the quarter and $9.3 billion for fiscal 2026. FY2027 guidance calls for revenue of $72.2 billion to $73.4 billion and $7.5 billion in AI infrastructure revenue. The issue is margin mix. Non-GAAP gross margin dropped to 66.3% from 68.4% on heavier AI hardware volume and memory cost inflation. CEO Chuck Robbins called it "a very strong close to fiscal 2026, marking another record year for Cisco," but the stock is trading as if expectations were priced for perfection.
Why Ciena and Nokia Are Rallying Off the Same Data
The read-through is that data center interconnect and coherent optical transport demand is inflecting hard. On Lumentum's conference call earlier this week CEO Michael Hurlston said:
"Expanding, inferencing and training applications are driving full rate connectivity between data centers, while political and regulatory constraints favor smaller, more modular builds. These 2 factors among others are substantially increasing the demand for our pump laser solutions. To put this in perspective, for one major hyperscaler, the network capacity connecting just 2 AI data center sites could double the total global backbone capacity they built over the entirety of the last decade. To support the growth and scale across deployments, we have secured multiple long-term customer agreements that helped offset our planned capital expenditures. We continue to expect a fourfold increase in our pump laser shipments over the next several quarters to meet this escalating demand. "
Story Continues
That quote is music to the ears of companies like Nokia and Ciena. In addition, Coherent CEO James Anderson said on last night's call that "The demand just continues to go up for anything DCI or scale across related."Cisco said their Acacia optics unit had another $1 billion quarter that was "very strong."
That is exactly the addressable market Ciena and Nokia sell into. Ciena's most recent quarter showed 39.51% revenue growth with cloud provider revenue at 46% of total, growing 70% year over year. Nokia's Q2 AI and Cloud revenue more than doubled year over year with $3.2 billion in AI and Cloud order intake. Nokia trades as a US-listed ADR.
Another catalyst for this group appears to be Wall Street commentary. Last night JPMorgan issued a note taht the strongest parts of Cisco's earnings had positive read-through for Nokia as the company reported surprisingly strong telecom orders. That's also positive read-through for Ciena itself.
The Split on the Screen
Ticker
Today
YTD
COHR
-4.39%
+92.69%
CSCO
-8.48%
+63.15%
CIEN
+6.04%
+84.74%
NOK
+3.29%
+61.85%
The two that reported are down. The transport and interconnect vendors around them are up. Coherent still has heavy analyst backing, with a consensus target of $394.62 against today's $340.04 print.
Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Cisco Systems didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today .
Contact editorial@247wallst.com for any questions or corrections.
Coherent业绩与光连接需求
重要性4/5 中高
公司正式业绩披露提供高密度财务事实,并直接关联COHR及AI数据中心光互联需求;未来增长判断仍依赖管理层表述。
中文摘要
核心结论
Coherent Corp.(相干公司)2026财年第四季度收入和利润率显著增长,管理层同时报告AI(人工智能)数据中心对光连接的需求、产能扩张和新增长平台进展。业绩数据已兑现,但未来需求判断仍来自公司管理层。
重要性评级
评级:4/5(中高)
公司正式业绩新闻稿提供了清晰的收入、毛利率和每股收益数据,并直接关联COHR(纽约证券交易所代码)及AI数据中心光互联需求;需求持续性和扩产兑现情况尚缺乏外部验证。
关键事实
- 公司于美东时间 08/11 20:00(UTC+8 08/12 08:00)发布2026财年第四季度及全年业绩,财年于06/30结束。
- 第四季度收入20.5亿美元,同比增长34%;按备考口径同比增长42%。
- GAAP(美国通用会计准则)毛利率为38.5%,同比提高277个基点;非GAAP毛利率为40.2%,同比提高215个基点。
- GAAP每股收益为1.19美元,同比提高2.02美元;非GAAP每股收益为1.74美元,同比提高0.74美元。
- CEO Jim Anderson称客户需求强劲、生产能力持续扩张,多个新增长平台开始放量。
- 管理层判断,AI数据中心架构逐步从铜连接转向光连接,公司将扩大制造能力以满足客户需求。
作者观点与证据
文章是Coherent发布的公司业绩新闻稿。已公布的收入、毛利率和每股收益属于公司财务披露;关于AI数据中心从铜转向光连接、2027财年需求加速及多年度机会的内容属于CEO和CFO的管理层判断,新闻稿没有提供客户订单、独立需求统计或量化指引作为交叉验证。
与相关标的的关系
COHR主营光子技术和制造业务,收入、毛利率及每股收益改善直接构成公司基本面信息。光连接需求若持续增长,可能影响其数据中心相关产品的订单、产能利用率和利润率;当前材料未披露具体客户、订单规模或各产品线贡献。
时效性与限制
这是08/12发布的2026财年第四季度及全年结果,业绩数据覆盖至06/30,属于已结束期间。2027财年需求、扩产和新平台进展仍是管理层展望,后续需要新的财务披露验证。
后续跟踪
- 2027财年收入和订单增长是否延续。
- 新增制造能力的投产时间、利用率和资本投入。
- AI数据中心光连接产品的收入占比与毛利率变化。
- 新增长平台能否形成可量化的收入贡献。
英文原文
Coherent Corp. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2026 Results
8/12/2026
For Immediate Release
Coherent Corp. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2026 Results
- Q4 REVENUE OF $2.05B, INCREASED 34% Y/Y AND 42% Y/Y ON A PRO FORMA BASIS
- Q4 GAAP GROSS MARGIN OF 38.5%, INCREASED 277 bps Y/Y; Q4 NON-GAAP GROSS MARGIN OF 40.2%, INCREASED 215 bps Y/Y
- Q4 GAAP EPS OF $1.19, INCREASED $2.02 Y/Y; Q4 NON-GAAP EPS OF $1.74, INCREASED $0.74 Y/Y
SAXONBURG, Pa., August 12, 2026 – Coherent Corp. (NYSE: COHR) (“Coherent,” “We,” or the “Company”), a global leader in photonics, announced financial results today for its fiscal fourth quarter and full year fiscal 2026 ended June 30, 2026.
Revenue for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026 was $2.05 billion, with GAAP gross margin of 38.5% and GAAP net income of $1.19 per diluted share. On a non-GAAP basis, gross margin was 40.2% with net income per diluted share of $1.74.
“Fiscal 2026 was an outstanding year for Coherent, with record revenue, significant margin expansion, and non-GAAP EPS growth that was more than twice the rate of revenue growth” said Jim Anderson, CEO. “We enter fiscal 2027 with exceptional customer demand, expanding production capacity, and multiple new growth platforms beginning to ramp. As AI datacenter architectures increasingly transition from copper to optical connectivity, we believe Coherent’s broad photonic technology portfolio and manufacturing scale uniquely position us to deliver accelerating growth and capitalize on this multi-year opportunity.”
Sherri Luther, CFO, said, “Strong operational execution across our business drove meaningful gross margin expansion and converted our top-line revenue growth into robust GAAP and non-GAAP EPS growth. As we enter fiscal 2027, we remain disciplined in our capital allocation, prioritizing investments to expand manufacturing capacity so we can efficiently fulfill the ongoing acceleration in customer demand.”
Webcast Click here for full release
Investor Presentation
美国稀土链加速脱离中国
重要性4/5 中高
USAR直接关联稀土供应链和扩产节点,事实密度较高;文章距报告日已有数天,关键事项仍处于计划或审批阶段。
中文摘要
核心结论
USA Rare Earth(USAR)第二季度电话会把重点放在中国以外的稀土供应链建设,管理层将Serra Verde收购、Stillwater磁材产能、客户认证和Round Top项目列为近期执行节点。季度收入和调整后每股亏损均低于Zacks一致预期,原料成本、融资需求和项目审批仍是扩张约束。
重要性评级
评级:4/5(中高)
文章与USAR直接相关,包含收购、产能、客户需求和财务缺口等高密度事实;但发布时间早于报告日,且多数增长目标尚待审批、认证和建设兑现。
关键事实
- Zacks发布时间为美东时间 08/11 10:00(UTC+8 08/11 22:00)。
- 第二季度收入为580万美元,低于Zacks一致预期的780万美元;调整后每股亏损0.15美元,差于预期的0.07美元亏损。
- 管理层称Serra Verde股东投票将在08/28举行,是交易完成的最后障碍;项目目标为2027年末达到6400吨Trio年化产能,Thras Moraitis计划于10/01出任USAR CEO。
- USAR已与美国商务部签署最终协议,最多可获得16亿美元《美国芯片法》(CHIPS Act)资金;公司还提到Carester投资和南卡罗来纳州Blacksburg项目。
- 磁材客户管线超过100家,其中超过20家处于认证讨论;谅解备忘录和意向书覆盖2500吨年需求。Stillwater计划在年末达到600吨年化产能,并在2027年第一季度再安装600吨,首批磁材销售预计在年末出现。
- Round Top资源升级项目已钻探超过1万英尺,早期化验显示重稀土分布超过70%;可行性研究预计年末完成。
- 管理层称较高的重稀土原料成本已压低LCM毛利,公司已提价并预计在后续季度体现;磁屑回收可能覆盖成品磁材20%-30%的原料需求。
作者观点与证据
文章依据电话会管理层陈述、分析师问答和Zacks一致预期,认为USAR正尝试形成矿山、加工、金属和磁材制造一体化的非中国供应链。产能、客户订单、政府资金和回收比例主要是公司目标或管理层估计;季度收入和亏损差异则是已披露的财务事实。
与相关标的的关系
USAR是直接相关标的。Serra Verde完成、Stillwater投产、客户认证和Round Top可行性研究将决定非中国稀土链能否从项目叙事转为产量与销售。当前财务数据显示,公司在扩产前仍面临原料成本、资本投入和项目执行压力。
时效性与限制
文章发表于08/11,较报告日早约三天。Serra Verde投票、客户认证、政府资金到账和项目建设均未在文中证明已经完成;电话会内容由Zacks整理,产能与订单信息仍以公司后续文件和实际交付为准。
后续跟踪
- 08/28 Serra Verde股东投票及交易完成情况。
- Stillwater年末磁材产量和首批销售。
- 客户认证转化为正式订单的数量、期限和价格。
- Round Top可行性研究、重稀土回收率及资金来源。
英文原文
USAR Q2 Earnings Call Focuses on Scaling Non-China Supply
USAR Q2 Earnings Call Focuses on Scaling Non-China Supply
Zacks Equity Research
Tue, August 11, 2026 at 10:00 PM GMT+8 4 min read
- USAR
+1.09%
USA Rare Earth, Inc. USAR used its second-quarter earnings call to emphasize the buildout of an integrated rare earth chain outside China.
Management centered the outlook on closing Serra Verde, ramping Stillwater, qualifying magnet customers and advancing Round Top. The quarter also missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate on adjusted loss per share and revenues.
USAR Puts Supply Security at the Center
CEO Barbara Humpton said that availability, rather than price alone, has become the defining issue in rare earth supply chains. She described an emerging two-tier market with separate China and non-China sourcing structures.
Humpton mentioned that USAR is positioning itself to anchor the non-China tier through mining, processing, metals and magnet manufacturing across three continents.
She highlighted the planned Serra Verde acquisition, the Carester investment and Blacksburg, S.C., as a second U.S. metals and magnet site. USAR also signed definitive Commerce Department agreements providing access to up to $1.6 billion in CHIPS Act funding.
USA Rare Earth Moves Serra Verde Toward Closing
A Canaccord Genuity analyst asked about remaining Serra Verde closing hurdles. CFO William Steele said that the Aug. 28 shareholder vote was the final hurdle and no additional regulatory approvals remained.
Steele said that Serra Verde is targeting 6,400 metric tons of Trio run-rate capacity by the end of 2027. Management plans to provide more detail after closing.
Humpton said that Thras Moraitis, currently Serra Verde's CEO, is scheduled to become USA Rare Earth's CEO on Oct. 1, marking a leadership handoff.
USAR Tests Higher Pricing Amid Feedstock Tightness
Second-quarter revenues were $5.8 million, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $7.8 million. Adjusted net loss was $0.15 per share, wider than the consensus estimate of a $0.07 loss.
USA Rare Earth Inc. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise
USA Rare Earth Inc. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise USA Rare Earth Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | USA Rare Earth Inc. Quote
Steele said that higher raw material costs, especially for heavy rare earths, pressured gross margins at LCM. USAR is working with alternative suppliers ahead of anticipated Serra Verde and Carester feedstock access.
In response to a William Blair analyst, Steele said that USAR has already raised product prices and expects the impact in upcoming quarters. He tied the action to tighter non-China supply.
USA Rare Earth Targets Magnet Sales by Year-End
Steele said that the magnet pipeline includes more than 100 potential customers, with more than 20 in qualification discussions. MOUs and LOIs cover 2,500 metric tons of annual demand.
Story Continues
A William Blair analyst asked how those arrangements could develop. Steele said that contracts may range from single purchase orders to annual agreements, with selective offtake agreements based on transaction economics.
A ROTH Capital analyst asked about Stillwater's ramp. Steele said the site should reach 600 metric tons of run-rate magnet capacity by year-end, with another 600 metric tons being installed in the first quarter of 2027. First magnet sales are expected by year-end.
USAR Advances Round Top and Recycling
Steele said that Round Top drilled more than 10,000 feet in its resource upgrade program, with early assays confirming heavy rare earth distribution above 70%. The definitive feasibility study remains on track for year-end completion.
At Wheat Ridge, USAR is running three demonstration circuits covering Round Top ore, third-party mixed rare earth carbonate and magnet swarf recycling. July work produced commercial-grade dysprosium and NdPr oxide samples from recycled swarf.
A Cantor Fitzgerald analyst asked about recycling's future role. Steele replied that swarf could represent 20-30% of finished magnet output and, after recycling, could supply a similar share of raw material needs.
USA Rare Earth Keeps Execution Milestones in Focus
Management's tone remained centered on execution: complete Serra Verde, turn customer qualifications into orders, advance Round Top engineering and keep magnet capacity moving toward planned scale.
Humpton framed the next phase as moving material through each link of the chain at scale. Steele reinforced that focus through milestones for magnet sales, Stillwater capacity and project development.
USAR's Zacks Signals Stay Mixed
USAR carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) at present. Its Value Score is F, Growth Score is F, Momentum Score is C and VGM Score is F. Under the Zacks Style Scores framework, A and B grades are preferred, while F is the weakest grade.
The Rank #3 sits below the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and 2 (Buy) categories that Zacks identifies as stronger stock-selection signals. USAR's Style Score offers limited support, with Momentum at C and the other three at F. The Zacks Rank can change as estimates are revised after the results. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here .
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
USA Rare Earth Inc. (USAR) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
美股事实摘要
- 报价事实:上涨 13 / 下跌 6 / 震荡 0;广度 68.42%;平均较前交易日 +0.80%。
- 公开新闻/财报讨论覆盖:19 / 19 个标的;新闻条目 152 条。
公开数据对照
| 标的 | IBKR 当前价 | K线收盘 | K线来源 | 差异 | 5D | 20D | K线行数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT | 495.60 | 496.88 | Yahoo Finance chart API | -0.26% | -0.60% | +23.88% | 165 |
NVDA | 225.36 | 225.30 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +0.03% | +2.88% | +8.63% | 284 |
MRVL | 224.17 | 222.18 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +0.90% | +5.53% | +17.99% | 165 |
GFS | 52.97 | 52.69 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +0.53% | +4.63% | -9.53% | 165 |
APLD | 30.72 | 30.62 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +0.33% | +6.10% | +15.81% | 165 |
USAR | 18.68 | 18.61 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +0.38% | +6.89% | +16.97% | 165 |
SOXX | 549.90 | 550.74 | Yahoo Finance chart API | -0.15% | +3.42% | +3.82% | 286 |
SOXL | 144.43 | 145.36 | Yahoo Finance chart API | -0.64% | +9.85% | +2.02% | 165 |
FTXL | 239.79 | 239.79 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +0.00% | +4.01% | +4.52% | 286 |
PSI | 151.50 | 151.61 | Yahoo Finance chart API | -0.07% | +4.81% | +4.41% | 286 |
DRAM | 57.12 | 56.93 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +0.33% | +10.67% | +8.77% | 92 |
KMEM | 18.52 | 18.59 | Yahoo Finance chart API | -0.38% | +11.05% | +6.78% | 31 |
VRT | 287.50 | 287.07 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +0.15% | +4.32% | -2.39% | 284 |
COHR | 326.70 | 327.23 | Yahoo Finance chart API | -0.16% | -2.09% | +18.15% | 283 |
CRCL | 75.53 | 75.38 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +0.20% | +19.12% | +24.31% | 282 |
SPCX | 141.91 | 141.29 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +0.44% | +22.95% | +7.76% | 43 |
GOOG | 343.95 | 343.94 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +0.00% | -3.56% | -2.79% | 165 |
NBIS | 258.98 | 255.04 | Yahoo Finance chart API | +1.54% | +34.32% | +48.48% | 165 |
PLTR | 177.95 | 179.01 | Yahoo Finance chart API | -0.59% | +14.81% | +33.15% | 125 |
期权链事实
观察标的:MSFT, NVDA, MRVL, GFS, APLD, USAR, SOXX, SOXL, FTXL, PSI, DRAM, KMEM, VRT, COHR, CRCL, SPCX, GOOG, SPY, QQQ, PLTR, NBIS
来源:Yahoo Finance 公开期权链
覆盖:20 / 21 个观察标的。
| 标的 | ATM IV | Put/Call Vol | Put/Call OI | Max Pain | 最大OI | 期限结构 | Vol/OI异常 | 大单数 | 新闻数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT | 26.18% | 0.76 | 0.55 | 420.00 | C 550.00 (53,579) / P 350.00 (11,312) | 7D 26.18% / 28D 26.60% / 63D 28.00% / 98D 31.64% | 0 | 5 | |
NVDA | 32.70% | 0.58 | 0.82 | 205.00 | C 180.00 (106,200) / P 180.00 (69,385) | 7D 32.70% / 28D 39.61% / 63D 38.39% / 98D 40.69% | 1 | 5 | |
MRVL | 73.80% | 0.60 | 0.90 | 200.00 | C 250.00 (15,428) / P 200.00 (9,051) | 7D 73.80% / 28D 83.84% / 63D 81.25% / 98D 79.85% | 3 | 5 | |
GFS | 55.47% | 0.68 | 0.66 | 55.00 | C 70.00 (18,243) / P 45.00 (3,069) | 7D 55.47% / 35D 60.83% / 63D 64.15% / 154D 69.21% | 0 | 0 | 5 |
APLD | 86.18% | 0.64 | 0.43 | 30.00 | C 35.00 (18,708) / P 30.00 (4,322) | 7D 86.18% / 28D 87.65% / 42D 86.67% / 63D 93.32% | 1 | 0 | 5 |
USAR | 79.30% | 0.64 | 0.88 | 17.50 | C 23.00 (8,813) / P 16.00 (8,068) | 7D 79.30% / 28D 86.82% / 42D 85.11% / 126D 92.60% | 0 | 0 | 5 |
SOXX | 44.61% | 1.47 | 1.19 | 525.00 | C 550.00 (13,829) / P 490.00 (11,096) | 7D 44.61% / 28D 46.81% / 63D 47.66% / 98D 48.36% | 4 | 5 | |
SOXL | 118.52% | 3.21 | 2.61 | 119.00 | C 160.00 (3,546) / P 20.00 (12,346) | 7D 118.52% / 28D 124.60% / 42D 126.11% / 98D 132.37% | 3 | 5 | |
FTXL | 51.56% | 0.29 | 0.38 | 225.00 | C 280.00 (142) / P 280.00 (68) | 7D 51.56% / 35D 50.97% / 126D 52.82% / 217D 56.16% | 0 | 0 | 5 |
PSI | 61.35% | 0.19 | 0.18 | 145.00 | C 205.00 (1,150) / P 135.00 (62) | 7D 61.35% / 35D 57.35% / 98D 52.79% / 189D 51.75% | 0 | 0 | 5 |
DRAM | 70.24% | 0.35 | 0.60 | 58.00 | C 60.00 (110,933) / P 60.00 (50,878) | 7D 70.24% / 28D 67.62% / 63D 70.37% / 98D 71.71% | 5 | 5 | |
VRT | 59.98% | 1.88 | 1.55 | 290.00 | C 400.00 (2,794) / P 210.00 (11,820) | 7D 59.98% / 28D 58.54% / 63D 60.75% / 98D 64.96% | 0 | 0 | 5 |
COHR | 81.90% | 1.13 | 1.23 | 340.00 | C 400.00 (2,933) / P 240.00 (2,436) | 7D 81.90% / 28D 79.69% / 63D 80.28% / 98D 83.31% | 3 | 5 | |
CRCL | 80.76% | 0.65 | 0.80 | 71.00 | C 80.00 (9,678) / P 75.00 (7,179) | 7D 80.76% / 28D 79.09% / 63D 80.58% / 126D 81.74% | 5 | 5 | |
SPCX | 68.97% | 1.06 | 0.99 | 135.00 | C 450.00 (53,073) / P 125.00 (42,011) | 7D 68.97% / 28D 67.13% / 63D 67.22% / 98D 69.57% | 4 | 5 | |
GOOG | 28.43% | 0.41 | 0.84 | 350.00 | C 365.00 (13,150) / P 350.00 (11,589) | 7D 28.43% / 28D 28.96% / 63D 30.29% / 98D 34.18% | 2 | 5 | |
SPY | 9.77% | 1.46 | 4.13 | 755.00 | C 780.00 (82,414) / P 500.00 (301,313) | 7D 9.77% / 28D 12.21% / 63D 13.86% / 98D 14.90% | 8 | 0 | |
QQQ | 15.78% | 0.92 | 1.18 | 700.00 | C 700.00 (44,210) / P 680.00 (69,561) | 7D 15.78% / 28D 18.98% / 63D 20.78% / 98D 22.34% | 8 | 0 | |
PLTR | 47.73% | 0.62 | 0.89 | 140.00 | C 35.00 (20,703) / P 110.00 (14,939) | 7D 47.73% / 28D 47.56% / 63D 48.88% / 98D 55.62% | 5 | 5 | |
NBIS | 104.76% | 0.92 | 1.03 | 200.00 | C 250.00 (29,054) / P 120.00 (25,459) | 7D 104.76% / 28D 98.67% / 63D 99.82% / 98D 103.85% | 8 | 5 |
最新大单 / 异常成交
大单活动只保留最近一次成功的 Yahoo 期权链快照,不是逐笔成交 tape。 当前显示:本次快照 Top 80。
| 观察时间 | 标的 | 合约 | 方向 | Strike | 到期 | Volume | OI | IV | Vol/OI | 估算权利金 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ261120P00880000 | put | 880.00 | 2026-11-20 | 1,680 | 0 | 21.00% | N/A | $24,807,720 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260821C00696000 | call | 696.00 | 2026-08-21 | 5,274 | 7,723 | 35.68% | 0.68 | $19,798,596 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ261016C00360000 | call | 360.00 | 2026-10-16 | 400 | 400 | 90.91% | 1.00 | $14,976,400 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | PLTR | PLTR260821C00035000 | call | 35.00 | 2026-08-21 | 1,020 | 20,703 | 492.58% | 0.05 | $14,713,500 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPCX | SPCX260821P00200000 | put | 200.00 | 2026-08-21 | 2,457 | 5,527 | 162.60% | 0.44 | $14,342,738 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA260821C00225000 | call | 225.00 | 2026-08-21 | 24,812 | 46,057 | 33.83% | 0.54 | $11,413,520 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ261016C00750000 | call | 750.00 | 2026-10-16 | 6,121 | 18,208 | 21.45% | 0.34 | $11,305,487 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA260911C00200000 | call | 200.00 | 2026-09-11 | 4,055 | 2,206 | 47.14% | 1.84 | $11,262,763 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPCX | SPCX260821C00135000 | call | 135.00 | 2026-08-21 | 11,548 | 19,807 | 67.68% | 0.58 | $10,653,030 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NBIS | NBIS261016P00270000 | put | 270.00 | 2026-10-16 | 2,069 | 62 | 97.03% | 33.37 | $10,376,035 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | PLTR | PLTR261120P00330000 | put | 330.00 | 2026-11-20 | 536 | 325 | 175.48% | 1.65 | $9,783,340 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY260821C00780000 | call | 780.00 | 2026-08-21 | 26,512 | 82,414 | 10.02% | 0.32 | $9,584,088 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | PLTR | PLTR260821C00175000 | call | 175.00 | 2026-08-21 | 12,511 | 9,607 | 49.26% | 1.30 | $9,133,030 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260821P00790000 | put | 790.00 | 2026-08-21 | 1,502 | 0 | 37.48% | N/A | $8,659,781 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | PLTR | PLTR260821C00180000 | call | 180.00 | 2026-08-21 | 18,575 | 13,564 | 48.39% | 1.37 | $8,498,063 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY260821C00775000 | call | 775.00 | 2026-08-21 | 12,803 | 55,821 | 10.90% | 0.23 | $8,360,359 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPCX | SPCX260821C00150000 | call | 150.00 | 2026-08-21 | 29,431 | 39,115 | 72.49% | 0.75 | $8,299,542 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA261016C00205000 | call | 205.00 | 2026-10-16 | 2,957 | 11,623 | 43.15% | 0.25 | $8,116,965 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260911C00705000 | call | 705.00 | 2026-09-11 | 2,019 | 176 | 25.15% | 11.47 | $7,267,391 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NBIS | NBIS260821C00260000 | call | 260.00 | 2026-08-21 | 5,198 | 2,786 | 104.36% | 1.87 | $7,017,300 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260821C00740000 | call | 740.00 | 2026-08-21 | 19,493 | 29,550 | 15.77% | 0.66 | $6,959,001 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPCX | SPCX260821C00145000 | call | 145.00 | 2026-08-21 | 16,165 | 19,700 | 70.68% | 0.82 | $6,950,950 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260821C00735000 | call | 735.00 | 2026-08-21 | 12,169 | 20,966 | 16.41% | 0.58 | $6,918,077 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA260821C00230000 | call | 230.00 | 2026-08-21 | 27,860 | 83,778 | 33.11% | 0.33 | $6,881,420 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260821C00730000 | call | 730.00 | 2026-08-21 | 7,727 | 34,910 | 17.23% | 0.22 | $6,552,496 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ261120P00800000 | put | 800.00 | 2026-11-20 | 914 | 1,075 | 15.95% | 0.85 | $6,546,068 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA260821C00220000 | call | 220.00 | 2026-08-21 | 8,020 | 61,335 | 35.18% | 0.13 | $6,115,250 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NBIS | NBIS260821C00270000 | call | 270.00 | 2026-08-21 | 6,174 | 4,364 | 105.08% | 1.41 | $6,096,825 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260821P00730000 | put | 730.00 | 2026-08-21 | 11,098 | 8,147 | 14.92% | 1.36 | $6,004,018 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY260821C00785000 | call | 785.00 | 2026-08-21 | 34,278 | 61,690 | 9.57% | 0.56 | $5,895,816 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | MSFT | MSFT260821C00500000 | call | 500.00 | 2026-08-21 | 9,799 | 46,940 | 24.46% | 0.21 | $5,462,943 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY260821C00774000 | call | 774.00 | 2026-08-21 | 6,931 | 3,999 | 11.23% | 1.73 | $4,990,320 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPCX | SPCX260821P00140000 | put | 140.00 | 2026-08-21 | 9,207 | 16,211 | 68.60% | 0.57 | $4,672,553 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NBIS | NBIS260821P00250000 | put | 250.00 | 2026-08-21 | 3,501 | 699 | 103.28% | 5.01 | $4,551,300 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260821C00555000 | call | 555.00 | 2026-08-21 | 252 | 286 | 95.17% | 0.88 | $4,483,206 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260821P00720000 | put | 720.00 | 2026-08-21 | 17,382 | 27,319 | 16.42% | 0.64 | $4,449,792 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | MRVL | MRVL260821P00390000 | put | 390.00 | 2026-08-21 | 255 | 0 | 157.81% | N/A | $4,284,000 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NBIS | NBIS260821C00250000 | call | 250.00 | 2026-08-21 | 2,313 | 29,054 | 105.90% | 0.08 | $4,261,703 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ261120C00480000 | call | 480.00 | 2026-11-20 | 164 | 81 | 57.41% | 2.02 | $4,237,186 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260821C00720000 | call | 720.00 | 2026-08-21 | 2,638 | 17,063 | 21.27% | 0.15 | $4,181,230 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | DRAM | DRAM260821C00050000 | call | 50.00 | 2026-08-21 | 5,728 | 9,244 | 74.41% | 0.62 | $4,167,120 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | GOOG | GOOG261016C00345000 | call | 345.00 | 2026-10-16 | 2,339 | 1,362 | 32.12% | 1.72 | $4,099,098 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260911C00700000 | call | 700.00 | 2026-09-11 | 1,006 | 209 | 26.06% | 4.81 | $4,036,072 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY261120P00745000 | put | 745.00 | 2026-11-20 | 3,372 | 3,926 | 15.83% | 0.86 | $4,019,424 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ261120C00775000 | call | 775.00 | 2026-11-20 | 2,307 | 791 | 22.20% | 2.92 | $3,988,803 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | PLTR | PLTR260821C00185000 | call | 185.00 | 2026-08-21 | 14,904 | 9,476 | 47.93% | 1.57 | $3,979,368 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA260821C00210000 | call | 210.00 | 2026-08-21 | 2,406 | 36,003 | 41.65% | 0.07 | $3,867,645 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ261120P00805000 | put | 805.00 | 2026-11-20 | 501 | 899 | 17.10% | 0.56 | $3,825,386 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY260821C00770000 | call | 770.00 | 2026-08-21 | 3,709 | 27,120 | 12.07% | 0.14 | $3,809,143 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA261016C00215000 | call | 215.00 | 2026-10-16 | 1,832 | 16,213 | 41.52% | 0.11 | $3,801,400 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA260821C00215000 | call | 215.00 | 2026-08-21 | 3,266 | 34,495 | 37.38% | 0.09 | $3,739,570 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | GOOG | GOOG261016P00345000 | put | 345.00 | 2026-10-16 | 2,249 | 934 | 28.46% | 2.41 | $3,738,963 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA260911C00230000 | call | 230.00 | 2026-09-11 | 4,605 | 4,960 | 40.17% | 0.93 | $3,672,488 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260821C00725000 | call | 725.00 | 2026-08-21 | 3,091 | 10,411 | 18.40% | 0.30 | $3,647,380 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY261016P00750000 | put | 750.00 | 2026-10-16 | 4,255 | 6,933 | 15.09% | 0.61 | $3,578,455 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | DRAM | DRAM260821C00060000 | call | 60.00 | 2026-08-21 | 28,810 | 110,933 | 70.70% | 0.26 | $3,471,605 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | PLTR | PLTR261120P00400000 | put | 400.00 | 2026-11-20 | 137 | 0 | 0.00% | N/A | $3,451,441 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SOXL | SOXL260821P00144000 | put | 144.00 | 2026-08-21 | 3,523 | 925 | 121.78% | 3.81 | $3,426,117 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NBIS | NBIS260821C00190000 | call | 190.00 | 2026-08-21 | 515 | 8,178 | 128.17% | 0.06 | $3,405,438 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY260821C00760000 | call | 760.00 | 2026-08-21 | 1,766 | 17,181 | 15.15% | 0.10 | $3,383,656 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY260821P00775000 | put | 775.00 | 2026-08-21 | 10,882 | 5,467 | 9.60% | 1.99 | $3,362,538 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ261120P00680000 | put | 680.00 | 2026-11-20 | 2,406 | 6,798 | 23.15% | 0.35 | $3,359,979 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPCX | SPCX260821C00140000 | call | 140.00 | 2026-08-21 | 5,132 | 12,842 | 69.34% | 0.40 | $3,297,310 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPCX | SPCX260821C00127000 | call | 127.00 | 2026-08-21 | 2,096 | 798 | 76.00% | 2.63 | $3,285,480 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA261016P00220000 | put | 220.00 | 2026-10-16 | 2,915 | 54,364 | 37.25% | 0.05 | $3,257,513 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | CRCL | CRCL261016P00085000 | put | 85.00 | 2026-10-16 | 2,005 | 822 | 79.61% | 2.44 | $3,228,050 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY261120C00680000 | call | 680.00 | 2026-11-20 | 292 | 579 | 30.09% | 0.50 | $3,167,178 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | COHR | COHR261016P00400000 | put | 400.00 | 2026-10-16 | 340 | 1,062 | 79.35% | 0.32 | $3,153,500 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ261120C00800000 | call | 800.00 | 2026-11-20 | 3,069 | 3,649 | 21.42% | 0.84 | $3,144,191 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA261016C00220000 | call | 220.00 | 2026-10-16 | 1,762 | 85,332 | 40.92% | 0.02 | $3,136,360 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SOXX | SOXX261120P00565000 | put | 565.00 | 2026-11-20 | 544 | 1,038 | 45.81% | 0.52 | $3,130,720 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY260821C00777000 | call | 777.00 | 2026-08-21 | 5,889 | 5,528 | 10.62% | 1.07 | $3,103,503 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA261016C00180000 | call | 180.00 | 2026-10-16 | 647 | 106,200 | 50.54% | 0.01 | $3,095,895 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA261120C00200000 | call | 200.00 | 2026-11-20 | 875 | 24,132 | 45.82% | 0.04 | $3,066,875 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | MSFT | MSFT261120C00470000 | call | 470.00 | 2026-11-20 | 603 | 1,543 | 35.50% | 0.39 | $2,992,388 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY261016C00790000 | call | 790.00 | 2026-10-16 | 2,247 | 8,755 | 14.19% | 0.26 | $2,950,311 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | NVDA | NVDA261016C00225000 | call | 225.00 | 2026-10-16 | 1,890 | 10,858 | 40.32% | 0.17 | $2,877,525 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | QQQ | QQQ260821C00732000 | call | 732.00 | 2026-08-21 | 3,937 | 3,467 | 16.96% | 1.14 | $2,870,073 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY260821P00777000 | put | 777.00 | 2026-08-21 | 7,281 | 652 | 9.33% | 11.17 | $2,781,342 |
| 2026-08-14 02:36:44.749Z | SPY | SPY261016C00650000 | call | 650.00 | 2026-10-16 | 210 | 294 | 36.28% | 0.71 | $2,780,505 |
技术指标事实
| 标的 | 类型 | Benchmark | 最新价 | Strength | 日线九转 | 1H 支撑 / 压力 | 4H 支撑 / 压力 | 1D 支撑 / 压力 | 数据限制 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT | 美股/ETF | SPY | 495.7200 | 11.11 | 低序列第2根 | 490.5744 (-1.04%;摆动低点/区间极值/布林下轨) / 497.2552 (+0.31%;MA20/布林中轨/MA30) | 489.7612 (-1.20%;摆动低点/布林下轨/摆动高点) / 498.1335 (+0.49%;MA5/MA10/摆动低点) | 493.1670 (-0.75%;MA10) / 499.8340 (+0.59%;MA5) | - |
NVDA | 美股/ETF | SPY | 225.4200 | 6.03 | 高序列第2根 | 224.4190 (-0.44%;摆动低点/布林下轨/MA30) / 226.7479 (+0.59%;摆动高点/布林上轨/区间极值) | 224.9925 (-0.19%;MA5/摆动高点) / 227.2612 (+0.82%;摆动高点/区间极值/布林上轨) | 224.7600 (-0.24%;摆动高点) / 227.4000 (+0.93%;摆动高点) | - |
MRVL | 美股/ETF | SPY | 224.3100 | 17.72 | 高序列第3根 | 221.5164 (-1.25%;摆动高点/摆动低点/MA30) / 225.5772 (+0.56%;MA5/摆动高点/MA10) | 222.0230 (-1.02%;摆动高点/MA5) / 226.5440 (+1.00%;摆动高点/布林上轨) | 218.2600 (-1.76%;摆动高点) / 222.8050 (+0.28%;摆动高点/摆动低点) | - |
GFS | 美股/ETF | SPY | 52.8300 | -9.11 | 低序列第1根 | 52.7466 (-0.16%;摆动高点/摆动低点/布林下轨) / 53.5691 (+1.40%;布林上轨/摆动高点) | 52.2343 (-1.13%;摆动高点/MA20/布林中轨) / 52.9520 (+0.23%;MA5/摆动低点) | 52.1340 (-1.06%;MA5) / 52.7140 (+0.05%;MA20/布林中轨) | - |
APLD | 美股/ETF | SPY | 30.7611 | 0.54 | 高序列第2根 | 30.7200 (-0.13%;摆动低点/摆动高点/MA5) / 30.9894 (+0.74%;MA20/布林中轨/MA30) | 30.4800 (-0.91%;摆动高点) / 30.8263 (+0.21%;摆动高点/MA10/MA5) | 30.5100 (-0.36%;摆动低点) / 31.4800 (+2.81%;摆动高点) | - |
USAR | 美股/ETF | SPY | 18.6500 | 11.51 | 低序列第1根 | 18.5762 (-0.40%;摆动高点/摆动低点/MA20) / 18.8501 (+1.07%;摆动低点/摆动高点/布林上轨) | 18.4740 (-0.94%;MA5) / 18.7243 (+0.40%;MA10/MA20/布林中轨) | 17.6960 (-4.91%;MA10) / 18.8600 (+1.34%;MA5) | - |
SOXX | 美股/ETF | SPY | 552.3000 | 3.35 | 高序列第3根 | 551.9257 (-0.07%;摆动低点/摆动高点/MA30) / 561.7541 (+1.71%;布林上轨/摆动高点/区间极值) | 549.5794 (-0.49%;MA10/摆动高点/MA5) / 555.8083 (+0.64%;摆动高点/布林上轨) | 547.9100 (-0.51%;摆动高点) / 561.4030 (+1.94%;摆动高点/MA60) | - |
SOXL | 美股/ETF | SPY | 146.3600 | 8.53 | 高序列第3根 | 146.2135 (-0.10%;MA30/MA20/布林中轨) / 148.1010 (+1.19%;摆动高点/MA10) | 144.8410 (-1.04%;摆动高点/MA5) / 146.5450 (+0.13%;摆动高点) | 144.3400 (-0.70%;摆动高点) / 146.9337 (+1.08%;MA30) | - |
FTXL | 美股/ETF | SPY | 239.7900 | 2.69 | 高序列第3根 | 236.3579 (-1.43%;摆动高点/摆动低点/布林下轨) / 240.0265 (+0.10%;摆动低点/MA5/MA20) | 238.3148 (-0.62%;摆动低点/摆动高点/MA5) / 240.1900 (+0.17%;摆动高点) | 237.8200 (-0.82%;摆动高点) / 245.6700 (+2.45%;摆动高点) | - |
PSI | 美股/ETF | SPY | 151.5000 | 4.15 | 高序列第3根 | 150.3450 (-0.76%;摆动低点/摆动高点) / 152.3164 (+0.54%;MA30/MA5/MA20) | 150.1432 (-0.90%;摆动低点/MA10/摆动高点) / 151.8740 (+0.25%;MA5) | 150.5350 (-0.71%;摆动高点/摆动低点) / 155.7773 (+2.75%;MA60/摆动高点) | - |
DRAM | 美股/ETF | SPY | 57.9300 | 5.51 | 高序列第2根 | 57.4330 (-0.86%;MA10/MA5) / 58.1800 (+0.43%;摆动高点/区间极值) | 56.8100 (-1.93%;摆动低点) / 58.0548 (+0.22%;布林上轨/摆动高点) | 56.3800 (-0.97%;摆动高点) / 58.2000 (+2.23%;摆动低点) | - |
KMEM | 美股/ETF | SPY | 18.5200 | N/A | 高序列第2根 | 18.2715 (-1.34%;MA20/布林中轨) / 18.5500 (+0.16%;摆动低点) | 18.2190 (-1.63%;摆动高点/MA5) / 18.6209 (+0.54%;摆动低点/布林上轨) | 18.3483 (-1.30%;MA30) / 19.8047 (+6.53%;摆动高点/布林上轨/摆动低点) | 1D 少于 60 根K线 |
VRT | 美股/ETF | SPY | 288.2900 | 4.69 | 高序列第8根 | 286.7930 (-0.52%;摆动低点/摆动高点/布林下轨) / 289.6127 (+0.46%;MA20/布林中轨/MA10) | 286.2180 (-0.72%;摆动高点/MA120) / 288.6570 (+0.13%;MA10/摆动低点/MA5) | 286.8199 (-0.09%;摆动高点/MA30/摆动低点) / 294.7980 (+2.69%;摆动低点/MA120) | - |
COHR | 美股/ETF | SPY | 329.4000 | 14.59 | 低序列第1根 | 325.4704 (-1.19%;摆动低点/布林下轨) / 330.0780 (+0.21%;摆动低点/MA5/摆动高点) | 327.4250 (-0.60%;摆动低点/摆动高点) / 334.1780 (+1.45%;MA5) | 325.2920 (-0.59%;MA10) / 327.7800 (+0.17%;摆动高点) | - |
CRCL | 美股/ETF | SPY | 75.0100 | 4.91 | 高序列第6根 | 73.3963 (-2.15%;摆动高点/MA10) / 75.0940 (+0.11%;MA5) | 73.3500 (-2.21%;摆动高点) / 75.2538 (+0.33%;布林上轨) | 72.9495 (-3.22%;摆动高点/布林上轨) / 76.3560 (+1.29%;摆动高点/MA60) | - |
SPCX | 美股/ETF | SPY | 142.0000 | N/A | 高序列第6根 | 141.6530 (-0.24%;MA10/MA5) / 142.8070 (+0.57%;MA30) | 140.0897 (-1.35%;摆动高点/MA10) / 143.5500 (+1.09%;MA5) | 138.5160 (-1.96%;MA5) / 143.5648 (+1.61%;布林上轨) | 1D 少于 60 根K线 |
GOOG | 美股/ETF | SPY | 344.1000 | -6.39 | 低序列第6根 | 343.1015 (-0.29%;摆动低点/区间极值/布林下轨) / 346.1995 (+0.61%;摆动高点/MA60) | 342.2042 (-0.55%;摆动低点/摆动高点/MA10) / 347.0306 (+0.85%;摆动低点/摆动高点/MA60) | 342.4835 (-0.42%;摆动低点/MA120) / 347.2742 (+0.97%;MA20/布林中轨/MA5) | - |
PLTR | 美股/ETF | SPY | 178.2400 | 35.06 | 高序列第9根完成 | 177.4278 (-0.46%;摆动高点/MA10/MA5) / 180.0054 (+0.99%;摆动高点/区间极值/布林上轨) | 177.9400 (-0.17%;摆动高点) / 179.7550 (+0.85%;摆动高点/区间极值) | 174.4460 (-2.55%;MA5) / 179.7550 (+0.42%;摆动高点/区间极值) | - |
NBIS | 美股/ETF | SPY | 260.9100 | 33.15 | 高序列第2根 | 255.7558 (-1.98%;MA20/布林中轨/摆动高点) / 264.8963 (+1.53%;摆动高点/布林上轨) | 255.3180 (-2.14%;MA5) / 275.7393 (+5.68%;布林上轨/摆动高点/区间极值) | 254.1160 (-0.36%;布林上轨) / 278.8400 (+9.33%;摆动高点) | - |
BTCUSDT | Crypto | BTCUSDT | 63,519.9000 | 0.00 | 低序列第5根 | 63,472.9423 (-0.07%;摆动低点/区间极值/布林下轨) / 64,231.5869 (+1.12%;摆动高点/MA120/区间极值) | 63,440.9206 (-0.12%;摆动低点/布林下轨/摆动高点) / 64,262.0887 (+1.17%;摆动高点/MA30/MA120) | 62,340.6723 (-1.86%;摆动低点/布林下轨) / 63,902.3807 (+0.60%;MA60/MA5/摆动低点) | 自身为基准 |
ETHUSDT | Crypto | BTCUSDT | 1,887.6600 | 3.40 | 高序列第1根 | 1,877.6820 (-0.53%;摆动低点/区间极值/布林下轨) / 1,895.1132 (+0.39%;摆动高点/MA120/布林上轨) | 1,859.8473 (-1.47%;摆动低点/布林下轨) / 1,888.5291 (+0.05%;摆动高点/MA5/MA20) | 1,849.1370 (-2.04%;布林下轨/摆动低点/摆动高点) / 1,890.6025 (+0.16%;MA5/MA30/MA20) | - |
SOLUSDT | Crypto | BTCUSDT | 76.0700 | 4.46 | 高序列第1根 | 75.2049 (-1.14%;摆动低点/区间极值/布林下轨) / 76.2662 (+0.26%;摆动低点/MA30/MA60) | 75.3610 (-0.93%;MA60/布林下轨/摆动低点) / 76.1942 (+0.16%;MA10/MA5/MA20) | 74.9026 (-1.53%;MA20/布林中轨/摆动低点) / 76.1073 (+0.05%;MA5/摆动高点/摆动低点) | - |
账户、公开补充与来源
公开数据补充
- 报价观察时间为 2026-08-14 10:36 北京时间附近;美股尚处 08/14 常规盘前,多数 IBKR 股票报价为 data type 3 延迟行情,持仓表承接 08/13 完成收盘与盘后。
- 10 个持有证券的技术结构均已覆盖日线与 1H/4H 支撑、压力、触发和失效。
CRCL4H 历史已通过共享 market-history store 定向补齐;采集质量文件仍保留首次超时记录。所有标的缺结构化日线九转值,因此报告没有用历史文字描述生成自动触发。 - 六只 ETF 的发行商持仓均已取得:6/6 基金完成,23/23 可报价底层完成。
SOXL、DRAM、KMEM含 swap、期权、国债或现金等非股票结构,表内前十大强弱只覆盖明确可报价部分;PSI、DRAM缺基金级 NAV/溢折价事实。 - 期权是 Yahoo 公开链快照,
KMEM没有可用到期日;其余链缺 Bid/Ask、Greeks、GEX、主动买卖方向和历史 IV 分位。Put/Call、Max Pain 与 Volume/OI 只描述结构,不单独决定方向或对冲规模。 - Crypto 行情来自 Binance USDS-M 单一合约基准,不代表 CME、Coinbase 或全市场。08/13 ETF/ETP 流量中
BTC的IBIT、ETH的 ETHA/ETHB 缺失,汇总只覆盖源表已有基金。 - 公开文章共请求 165 篇,161 篇归档成功;主信号选择 8 篇并完成全文摘要。4 篇抓取失败没有由其他来源静默替代。
- 韩国和 A 股盘中快照缺同一时点完整广度,A 股两个指数时间相差约 24 分钟;报告保留代表性盘面,不据此生成全面行业结论。
IBKR 账户与保证金
| --- |--- | | 已连接 |是 | | 持仓数 |已隐藏 | | 错误数 |0 |
| --- |--- |--- |--- | | 已隐藏 |AvailableFunds |已隐藏 |USD | | 已隐藏 |BuyingPower |已隐藏 |USD | | 已隐藏 |GrossPositionValue |已隐藏 |USD | | 已隐藏 |InitMarginReq |已隐藏 |USD | | 已隐藏 |MaintMarginReq |已隐藏 |USD |
持仓上下文
- 已隐藏
- 已隐藏
- 已隐藏
数据源列表
- Binance 合约市场数据
- IBKR 行情数据
- IBKR 账户与持仓数据
- Merkl 官方奖励数据
- Yahoo Finance 公开期权链
- Yahoo Finance 历史行情
- Yahoo Finance 新闻检索
- 金十数据快讯事实雷达